Effects of plant residue management on soil properties, surface runoff, and soil loss under rainfall simulation in a semi-arid region in Iran

Ali Rasoulzadeh,Elnaz Azartaj,Ali Asghari,Akbar Ghavidel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15324982.2018.1537320

2018-12-04

Arid Land Research and Management

Abstract:A 5-year field study was conducted on the effect of plant residue management on soil erosion, runoff, bulk density, penetration resistance, and organic carbon. There were three treatments: burning residues on field (BR), returning residues unto the soil surface after harvesting (TR), and removing residues from soil surface (RR) (control treatment). At the end of the 5-year treatment, a rainfall simulation at 90 mm h−1 was applied to each plot. After rainfall simulation started, the runoff volume and soil loss amount in samples were collected at four sampling times. The results showed that the runoff volume for BR (from 145.5 ± 12.2 to 190.0 ± 11.8 mL) differed significantly (p ≤ 0.01) from that of RR (from 32.3 ± 5.5 to 67.5 ± 11.1 mL) and TR (from 10.0 ± 0.7 to 16.7 ± 3.3 mL). A significant difference (p ≤ 0.01) was also observed between RR and TR regarding runoff volume and soil loss amount in different sampling times, except for the first sampling time (2–4 min). The runoff volume in BR and TR was 215% higher and 294% lower than that of the control (RR), respectively. As compared to the control (RR), soil loss decreased by 96.5% in TR but increased by 192% in BR. The BR increased soil bulk density and penetration resistance by 4.9% and 12.4%, whereas TR reduced them by 2.1% and 15.8%, respectively, as compared to the control (RR). The results indicated that the highest (0.35) and lowest (0.03) runoff coefficients were obtained for BR and TR treatments, respectively. It is concluded that returning plant residues to soil is the best residue management practice in decreasing soil runoff volume and controlling soil erosion in semi-arid regions.

soil science,environmental sciences