Global Trends and Hotspots in Esketamine Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Past and Estimation of Future Trends
Xiang Li,Ping Xiang,Jianfen Liang,Yifan Deng,Jingyi Du
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S356284
2022-04-21
Abstract:Xiang Li, 1 Ping Xiang, 2 Jianfen Liang, 1 Yifan Deng, 1 Jingyi Du 1 1 Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Medical Quality Management, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Xiang Li, Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, People's Republic of China, Tel +86-20-85253132, Fax +86-20-85252297, Email Background: Being the S-enantiomer of racemic ketamine, esketamine is found to be effective for sedation, analgesia, and treating depression. However, there is no comprehensive bibliometric analysis about esketamine research. In this study, we aimed to determine the scientific output and emerging topics related to esketamine. Methods: Esketamine-related articles and reviews that published between 2000 and 2020 were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection database, using key word search of "esketamine" "esketamine hydrochloride", "s-ketamine", "S(+)-ketamine", "(S)-ketamine", or "(–)-ketamine". Various bibliographic elements were collected, including the annual number of publications, citation frequency, countries/regions, institutions, authors, journals, and keywords. Two sorts of scientometric software, namely VOS viewer and CiteSpace, were used to conduct bibliometric and knowledge-map analyses. Results: A total of 683 publications were included in the current study. We found the number of publications in esketamine research field had increased annually since 2016. The United States was the leader in this field, with the highest publications number (162, 23.72%), total citations (3504/9713, 36.08%) and H-index (40). The most productive institution was Chiba University in Japan, and esketamine-related papers were mainly published in the journal Anesthesia & Analgesia . The keyword co-occurrence analysis showed that keywords relevant to depression were the most frequent. Moreover, all identified keywords could be divided into four clusters, with the research focus gradually shifting from cluster of "anesthesia and analgesia detection" to "depression treatment effect.". Conclusion: The past two decades have shown a marked increase in esketamine research. The United States maintained a top position worldwide, making the most significant contributions in the field of esketamine research. The contributions and collaborations of Asian countries have continuously increased and is a strong area of growth as well as development in recent years. Additionally, the emerging hotspots of esketamine research concentrate on clarifying its depression treatment effect. Keywords: ketamine, esketamine, bibliometrics, research trends, depression Esketamine is the S-enantiomer of racemic ketamine and has a greater affinity (approximately two to four-fold) for N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors than the R-enantiomer of ketamine (arketamine). This reduces the required dose and lowers the risk of dose-dependent dissociative symptoms associated with ketamine administration. 1 Existing evidence indicates that esketamine has great analgesic and anesthetic activities and is increasingly used for preoperative sedation as well as pain management. 2–4 In addition to its analgesic and anesthetic effects, esketamine shows potent antidepressant effects, and the intranasal form of esketamine was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2019 for the management of treatment-resistant depression in adults. 5 Therefore, as an evolutionary drug with various pharmacological effects, the interest in esketamine is increasing. As one of the most popular mathematical statistics-based approaches, bibliometric analysis can assess academic productivity, summarize academic frontiers and hot spots, and predict scientific development trends in a research field according to scientific literature databases and metrological characteristics. Other approaches, such as traditional review, meta-analysis, or experimental research, are not able to achieve the same depth of analysis. 6 In addition, bibliometric analysis can qualitatively and quantitatively estimate the contribution and cooperation of disparate countries or regions, institutions, journals, and authors. To date, bibliometric analyses have been performed to overview cross-sectional and longitudinal scientific productivity in a wide range of medical areas, such as ferroptosis, 7 ultrasound microbubbles 8 and intestinal organoids. 9 In recent years, traditional reviews and meta-analyses have been conducted to -Abstract Truncated-