Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after direct-acting antiviral therapy: an individual patient data meta-analysis
Victor Sapena,Marco Enea,Ferran Torres,Ciro Celsa,Jose Rios,Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo,Pierre Nahon,Zoe Mariño,Ryosuke Tateishi,Tatsuya Minami,Angelo Sangiovanni,Xavier Forns,Hidenori Toyoda,Stefano Brillanti,Fabio Conti,Elisabetta Degasperi,Ming-Lung Yu,Pei-Chien Tsai,Kevin Jean,Mohamed El Kassas,Hend Ibrahim Shousha,Ashraf Omar,Claudio Zavaglia,Hiroko Nagata,Mina Nakagawa,Yasuhiro Asahina,Amit G Singal,Caitlin Murphy,Mohamed Kohla,Chiara Masetti,Jean-François Dufour,Nicolas Merchante,Luisa Cavalletto,liliana LC chemello,POL Stanislas,Javier Crespo,Jose Luis Calleja,Rosanna Villani,Gaetano Serviddio,Alberto Zanetto,Sarah Shalaby,Francesco Paolo Russo,Rob Bielen,Franco Trevisani,Calogero Cammà,Jordi Bruix,Giuseppe Cabibbo,Maria Reig,Stanislas POL
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323663
IF: 24.5
2021-03-19
Gut
Abstract:Objective The benefit of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) against HCV following successful treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. This meta-analysis of individual patient data assessed HCC recurrence risk following DAA administration. Design We pooled the data of 977 consecutive patients from 21 studies of HCV-related cirrhosis and HCC, who achieved complete radiological response after surgical/locoregional treatments and received DAAs (DAA group). Recurrence or death risk was expressed as HCC recurrence or death per 100 person-years (100PY). Propensity score-matched patients from the ITA.LI.CA. cohort (n=328) served as DAA-unexposed controls (no-DAA group). Risk factors for HCC recurrence were identified using random-effects Poisson. Results Recurrence rate and death risk per 100PY in DAA-treated patients were 20 (95% CI 13.9 to 29.8, I 2 =74.6%) and 5.7 (2.5 to 15.3, I 2 =54.3), respectively. Predictive factors for recurrence were alpha-fetoprotein logarithm (relative risk (RR)=1.11, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.19; p=0.01, per 1 log of ng/mL), HCC recurrence history pre-DAA initiation (RR=1.11, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.16; p<0.001), performance status (2 vs 0, RR=4.35, 95% CI 1.54 to 11.11; 2 vs 1, RR=3.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 11.11; p=0.01) and tumour burden pre-HCC treatment (multifocal vs solitary nodule, RR=1.75, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.43; p<0.001). No significant difference was observed in RR between the DAA-exposed and DAA-unexposed groups in propensity score-matched patients (RR=0.64, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.1; p=0.1). Conclusion Effects of DAA exposure on HCC recurrence risk remain inconclusive. Active clinical and radiological follow-up of patients with HCC after HCV eradication with DAA is justified.
gastroenterology & hepatology