Abstract:Abstract Paleolithic lithic assemblages are usually dominated by flakes and display a high degree of morphological variability. When analyzing Paleolithic lithic assemblages, it is common to classify flakes into categories based on their morphological and technological features, which are linked to the position of the flake in the reduction sequence and how removals are organized in a given production method. For the analysis of Middle Paleolithic lithic assemblages, two categories of flakes are commonly identified: core–edge flakes and pseudo-Levallois points. A third type, core–edge flakes with a limited back, is also commonly found in the archaeological literature, providing an alternative category whose definition does not match the two previous types but shares many of their morphological and technological features. The present study addresses whether these three flakes constitute discrete categories based on their morphological and technological attributes. 2D and 3D geometric morphometrics are employed on an experimental set composed of the three categories of flakes to quantify morphological variation. Machine learning models and principal components biplots are used to test the discreteness of the categories. The results indicate that geometric morphometrics succeed in capturing the morphological and technological features that characterize each type of product. Pseudo-Levallois points have the highest discreteness of the three technological products, and while some degree of mixture exists between core edge flakes and core edge flakes with a limited back, they are also highly distinguishable. We conclude that the three categories are discrete and can be employed in technological lists of products for the analysis of lithic assemblages and that geometric morphometrics is useful for testing for the validity of categories. When testing these technological categories, we stress the need for well-defined and shared lithic analytical units to correctly identify and interpret the technical steps and decisions made by prehistoric knappers and to properly compare similarities and differences between stone tool assemblages. These are key aspects for current research in which open datasets are becoming more and more common and used to build interpretative techno-cultural models on large geographical scales. Now more than ever, lithic specialists are aware of the need to overcome differences in taxonomies between different school traditions.

Blind test evaluation of consistency in macroscopic lithic raw material sorting

Making Sense of Residues on Flaked Stone Artefacts: Learning from Blind Tests

The Contribution of 2D and 3D Geometric Morphometrics to Lithic Taxonomies: Testing Discrete Categories of Backed Flakes from Recurrent Centripetal Core Reduction

Documenting scarce and fragmented residues on stone tools: an experimental approach using optical microscopy and SEM-EDS

Mechanical properties of lithic raw materials from Kazakhstan: Comparing chert, shale, and porphyry

Assessment of performance rates on the elemental comparison of small and irregular glass fragments using μ-XRF and LIBS

Extracting residues from stone tools for optical analysis: towards an experiment-based protocol

“All that glitters is not gold”: Evaluating the Nature of the Relationship Between Archeological Residues and Stone Tool Function

Test, Model, and Method Validation: The Role of Experimental Stone Artifact Replication in Hypothesis-driven Archaeology

Neural network analysis for predicting metrics of fragmented laminar artifacts: a case study from MPPNB sites in the Southern Levant

Results from an amino acid racemization inter-laboratory proficiency study; design and performance evaluation

Using 3D digital microscopy and SEM-EDX for in-situ residue analysis: A multi-analytical contextual approach on experimental stone tools

The quantitative assessment of archaeological artifact groups: Beyond geometric morphometrics

Resolving taphonomic and preparation biases in silicified faunas through paired acid residues and X-ray microscopy

Inter- and intra-observer variation in phytolith morphometry

Microbeam characterization of corning archeological reference glasses: New additions to the Smithsonian Microbeam Standard collection

Data from Multiple Portable XRF Units and Their Significance for Ancient Glass Studies

A testimony of prehistoric tasks: Diagnostic residues on stone tool working edges

Is Non-destructive Provenancing of Pottery Possible With Just a Few Discriminative Trace Elements?

Striated toolmarks comparison and reporting methods: review and perspectives

Visual Attention and Cognitive Archaeology: An Eye-Tracking Study of Palaeolithic Stone Tools