Abstract:Owing to the limitations of physical experiments on heavy oil, this study establishes a mathematical model for heavy oil–water two-phase flow based on the theory of multiphase flow, considering factors such as heavy oil viscosity, mixed flow velocity, and inlet water cut. Through transient calculations of 650 groups of heavy oil–water two-phase flows based on this model, six typical heavy oil–water two-phase flow patterns were identified by monitoring flow pattern cloud images, liquid holdup, and the probability density function (PDF) of liquid holdup: water-in-oil bubble flow, transitional flow, water-in-oil slug flow, oil-in-water bubble flow, oil-in-water very fine dispersed flow, and water-in-oil core-annular flow. Five sets of flow pattern maps for a heavy oil–water two-phase flow with different viscosities were established based on the inlet water cut and mixed flow velocity. The results showed that different heavy oil viscosities lead to different oil–water two-phase flow patterns. When the heavy oil viscosity is 100 mPa·s, the flow patterns include water-in-oil bubble flow, transitional flow, water-in-oil slug flow, oil-in-water bubble flow, and oil-in-water very fine dispersed bubble flow. When the heavy oil viscosity reaches 600 mPa·s, a water-in-oil core-annular flow appears, and the oil-in-water very fine dispersed bubble flow disappears. After the heavy oil viscosity exceeds 1100 mPa·s, the oil-in-water bubble flow disappears. Among the different flow patterns, the range of the water-in-oil slug flow is most affected by the viscosity and flow velocity. The greater the heavy oil viscosity, the larger the range. When the viscosity remained constant, a larger flow velocity resulted in a smaller range. The accuracy of the flow pattern predictions in the maps was verified by comparing them with field production data, confirming that the research results can provide a theoretical basis for understanding oil–water two-phase flow patterns in heavy oil wellbores.

Apparent viscosity characteristics and prediction model of an unstable oil-in-water or water-in-oil dispersion system

Effective viscosity prediction of crude oil-water mixtures with high water fraction

Rheological Behavior of Heavy Crude Oil and Its Emulsions

Development of a mathematical model of viscosity for prediction of emulsion of Water/Wax crude oil

Study on the mathematical model for predicting settling of water-in-oil emulsion

Oil-Water Two-Phase Flow with Three Different Crude Oils: Flow Structure, Droplet Size and Viscosity

Non-linear seepage law and a characterization model of heavy oil-in-water emulsion in porous media

Viscous fingering analysis for water-drive oil in the inclined plane

Experiments and model on viscosity characteristic of emulsion of heavy fuel oil and water for fluidity improvement

Investigating the dynamic characteristics of oil droplets spreading on solid surfaces in water

Experimental investigation of oil–water flow in the horizontal and vertical sections of a continuous transportation pipe

Investigation of wax deposition and effective diffusion coefficient in water-in-oil emulsion system

Emulsification behaviors of crude oil-water system and its quantitative relationship with exergy loss rate

Stability Analysis of Pure Oil-Water Emulsion in Gravity-Based Separators

Prediction Model between Emulsified Water Fractions and Physicochemical Properties of Crude Oil Based on the Exergy Loss Rate

Research on Oil–Water Two-Phase Flow Patterns in Wellbore of Heavy Oil Wells with Medium-High Water Cut

A Three-Phase Relative Permeability Model for Heavy Oil Emulsion System

Oil–Water Hydrodynamics Model during Oil Displacement by Water in Down-Hill Mobile Pipeline

Distribution characteristics of non-Newtonian fluid swirling flow field in a vane-type separator

A Unified Model of Oil/Water Two-Phase Flow through the Complex Pipeline

Experimental Characterization and Evaluation of Crude Spiking Influence on Oil/Water Dispersed Flow in Pipe