Abstract:Exact steady-state solutions are obtained for the motion of a multi-degree-of-freedom system (MDOF) that is provided, at an arbitrary location within the primary structure, with a highly-nonlinear auxiliary mass damper which resembles a conventional linear dynamic vibration neutralizer (DVN) whose relative motion with respect to the primary system is constrained to remain within a specified gap, thus operating as a "pounding DVN." This configuration of a conventional DVN with motion-limiting stops could be quite useful when a primary structure with a linear DVN is subjected to transient loads (e.g., earthquakes) that may cause excessive relative motion between the auxiliary and primary systems. Under the assumption that the motion of the composite nonlinear MDOF system under harmonic excitation is undergoing steady-state motion with two symmetric impacts per period of the excitation, an exact, closed-form solution is obtained for the motion of the MDOF as well as the nonlinear damper. This solution is subsequently used to develop an approximate analytical procedure to estimate the stationary response of the pounding DVN when subjected to random excitation with white spectral density and Gaussian probability distribution. Since the vibration control effectiveness of auxiliary mass dampers, whether linear or not, deteriorates considerably when dealing with transient dynamic loads, an extensive investigation is provided for assessing the influence and interaction effects of the major nonlinear system parameters, so as to provide useful guidelines for quantifying the tradeoffs in selecting a suitable strategy to enhance the mitigation capabilities of the subject class of dampers, under stationary as well as nonstationary deterministic and random dynamic environments.

Theoretical Upper and Lower Bounds of the Performance of an On-Off Damping Dynamic Vibration Absorber Attached to a Multi-Degree-of-Freedom System

Minimization of the Beam Response Using Inerter-Based Passive Vibration Control Configurations

Truly optimal semi-active damping to control free vibration of a single degree of freedom system

Optimal Bounded Control of Large Random Vibration Responses in Nonlinear Systems

Analytical Solutions to H∞ and H2 Optimization of Dynamic Vibration Absorbers Attached to Damped Linear Systems

Semi-active Bounded Optimal Control of Uncertain Nonlinear Coupling Vehicle System with Rotatable Inclined Supports and MR Damper under Random Road Excitation

Dynamic Impact of Hydraulic Systems Using Pressure Feedback for Active Damping

On $$\Frac{1}{2}$$-Dof Active Dampers to Suppress Multistability Vibration of a $$2$$-DOF Rotor Model Subjected to Simultaneous Multiparametric and External Harmonic Excitations

Application of Dynamic Vibration Absorbers in Structural Vibration Control under Multi-Frequency Harmonic Excitations

H∞ Optimization of a Novel Maxwell Dynamic Vibration Absorber with Lever, Inerter, and Grounded Stiffness

Exact H ∞ optimization of dynamic vibration absorbers: Univariate-polynomial-based algorithm and operability analysis

On 1/2 -DOF Active Dampers to Suppress Multistability Vibration of a 2 -DOF Rotor Model Subjected to Simultaneous Multiparametric and External Harmonic Excitations

Response of a multi-degree-of-freedom system with a pounding vibration neutralizer to harmonic and random excitation

Optimal Parameters for Dynamic Vibration Absorber with Negative Stiffness in Controlling Force Transmission to a Rigid Foundation

On -DOF active dampers to suppress multistability vibration of a -DOF rotor model subjected to simultaneous multiparametric and external harmonic excitations

Double-layer Vibration Suppression Bilinear System Featuring Electro-Rheological Damper with Optimal Damping and Semi-Active Control

Optimum Design of Dynamic Vibration Absorbers of the Continuous Parameters System Based on Power Flow

Achievable dynamic responses of general damped mass-chain systems

Experimental study on active vibration control via inverse modeling

H-infinity optimization of a variant design of the dynamic vibration absorber—Revisited and new results