Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the performance implications of two major mechanisms for organizational learning (i.e. exploration and exploitation). Exploration refers to firm activities that explore new and novel knowledge, whereas exploitation reflects the extent to which a firm reuses its existing knowledge. The authors predict curvilinear (i.e. an inverted U-shape) relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance, respectively. That is, firm performance first increases with exploration/exploitation at a decreasing rate; then, firm performance decreases at an increasing rate after firm performance reaches a maximum point. Furthermore, the authors examine whether the curvilinear relationships are moderated by two types of firm–stakeholder relationships (i.e. firm–employee and firm–customer relationships). Design/methodology/approach Using the data from National Bureau of Economic Research, US Patent Citations Data File, KLD Research and Analytics Inc. and Compustat series, the authors construct an unbalanced panel data set of 3,070 observations in 554 firms from 1991 to 2006. To test the hypotheses, feasible generalized least squares regression is used. Findings In consistent with the prediction, the authors find inverted U-shape relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance. The authors also find that the curvilinear relationships are moderated by firm–employee relationships. The relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance become stronger when firms have better relationships with employees. Research limitations/implications The study provides empirical evidence that better firm–employee relationships can strengthen the curvilinear relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance. The authors argue that future studies should extend to other stakeholder relationships, using more refined measures, and incorporating the concept of ambidexterity. Practical implications The findings suggest that managers should design innovation strategy based on performance implications of exploration/exploitation and that managers should also realize that stakeholder relationships can influence the relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance. First, the study shows that although exploration and exploitation can improve firm performance, too much exploration or exploitation is not good for firm performance. Therefore, managers should consider seriously the maximum point of performance that exploration and exploitation can reach and avoid too much exploration or exploitation. Second, firms can invest in firm–employee relationships to gain better performance implications from exploration/exploitation. The study shows that, as firms develop better firm–employee relationship, the relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance are stronger and firm performance is likely to reach a higher apex. Originality/value The authors find the inverted U-shape relationships between exploration/exploitation and firm performance, moreover, the authors add two contingent factors associated with stakeholders that can help exploration and exploitation contribute more to firm performance.

Organizational capabilities and value creation for stakeholders: evidence from publicly traded companies

Value Co-Creation and New Product Development Success: the Moderating Effect of Structural Empowerment

Stakeholder Engagement and The Impact on Promoting Social Value: A Study In Businesses with a Social Mission

Does Corporate Philanthropy Bring about Corporate Value the Empirical Evidence Using Stakeholder Satisfaction As a Moderating Variable from Listed Companies

Value Management: Enterprises' Interest in Stakeholders and Its Impact on Creating Sustainable Relationships with Suppliers and Buyers

ESG Dimensions and Corporate Value: Insights for Sustainable Investments

controversies about the relevance os esg from the perspective of value creation in the stakeholders capitalismo model

Value of corporate social responsibility for multiple stakeholders and social impact – Relationship marketing perspective

The impact of brand value co-creation on perceived CSR authenticity and brand equity

The impact of creating shared value strategy on corporate sustainable development: From resources perspective

Managerial Capability and Foreign Ownership: Mechanisms for Increasing Company Value

Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Financial Performance: An Analysis of Listed Companies in Brazil

Stakeholder engagement toward value co-creation in the F&B packaging industry

Does creating shared value make a difference? Exploring different determinants of firm competitiveness

Stakeholder Prioritization, Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Company Performance: Further Evidence

Do stakeholder relationships matter? An empirical study of exploration, exploitation and firm performance

Corporate social responsibility in a local subsidiary: internal and external stakeholders’ power

Unraveling the Relationship between Business Strategy and Shareholder Value Maximization

Return on share and the influence of Corporate Social Responsibility

Corporate social responsibility and the impact on economic value added: the role of environmental innovation

The impact of corporate social responsibility activities on stakeholders' value co‐creation behaviour