Abstract:The widely scattered pattern of meteorological stations in large watersheds and remote locations, along with a need to estimate meteorological data for point sites or areas where little or no data have been recorded, has encouraged the development and implementation of spatial interpolation techniques. The various interpolation techniques featured in GIS software allow for the extraction of this new information from spatially distinct point data. Since no one interpolation method can be accurate in all regions, each method must be evaluated prior to each geographically distinct application. Many methods have been used for interpolating minimum temperature (Tmin\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$T_{ \min }$$\end{document}), maximum temperature (Tmax\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$T_{ \max }$$\end{document}) and precipitation data; however, only a few methods have been used in the Zayandeh-Rud River basin, Iran, and no comparison of methods has ever been carried out in the area. The accuracies of six spatial interpolation methods [Inverse Distance Weighting, Natural Neighbor (NN), Regularized Spline, Tension Spline, Ordinary Kriging, Universal Kriging] were compared in this study simultaneously, and the best method for mapping monthly precipitation and temperature extremes was determined in a large semi-arid watershed with high temperature and rainfall variation. A cross-validation technique and long-term (1970–2014) average monthly Tmin\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$T_{ \min }$$\end{document}, Tmax\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$T_{ \max }$$\end{document} and precipitation data from meteorological stations within the basin were used to identify the best interpolation method for each variable dataset. For Tmin\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$T_{ \min }$$\end{document}, Kriging (Gaussian) proved to be the most accurate interpolation method (MAE = 1.827 °C), whereas, for Tmax\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$T_{ \max }$$\end{document} and precipitation the NN method performed best (MAE = 1.178 °C and 0.5241 mm, respectively). Accordingly, these variable-optimized interpolation methods were used to define spatial patterns of newly generated climatic maps.

Correction to: Analysis of deterministic and geostatistical interpolation techniques for mapping meteorological variables at large watershed scales

Analysis of deterministic and geostatistical interpolation techniques for mapping meteorological variables at large watershed scales

The Impact of Interpolation Method on the Accuracy of Meteorological Variables in Distributed Hydrological Model

Comparison between Geostatistical Interpolation and Numerical Weather Model Predictions for Meteorological Conditions Mapping

A Study on Spatial Interpolation Methods for Climate Variables Based on Geostatistics

A Spatial Interpolation of Meteorological Parameters considering Geographic Semantics

How the variations of terrain factors affect the optimal interpolation methods for multiple types of climatic elements?

On Temporal and Spatial Error Distributions of Five Precipitation Interpolation Models:A Case of Shenzhen

Correcting the Smoothing Effect of Ordinary Kriging Estimates in Soil Moisture Interpolation

Correction to: Estimating evapotranspiration by coupling Bayesian model averaging methods with machine learning algorithms

Correction to: A Method Based on Temporal Component Decomposition for Estimating 1-km All-Weather Land Surface Temperature by Merging Satellite Thermal Infrared and Passive Microwave Observations (vol 57, pg 4670, 2019)

Mapping the mean annual precipitation of China using local interpolation techniques

Discussion on the Reliability of the Mapping Function from Standard Atmosphere

INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT-SCALE ERRORS INTERACTIONS ON ANALYSIS AND FORECAST OF REGIONAL NWP MODEL

Study on Correction Technology of Summer Monthly Precipitation Forecast in Southwest China with Complicated Terrain

Uncertainty quantization of meteorological input and model parameters for hydrological modelling using a Bayesian‐based integrated approach

Accurate Global Atmospheric State Analysis Using Objective Error Statistics Including Observation Error Dependence on Water Substance Field

AN IMPROVED TEMPERATURE SPATIAL INTERPOLATION METHOD FOR SPACEBORNE LIDAR ATMOSPHERIC CORRECTION

Usage of multivariate geostatistics in interpolation processes for meteorological precipitation maps

Numerical Studies on Forecast Error Correction of GRAPES Model with Variational Approach

A robust stochastic approach in correcting the TRMM precipitation product and simulating flood features