On the engagement with social theory in food studies: cultural symbols and social practices

Nicklas Neuman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2018.1547069
2018-12-20
Abstract:This paper is based on a two-part argument. First, food studies should be more engaged in social theory. It is argued that a greater engagement with theoretical debates and developments, as well as clearer theoretical conflicts in the field, would increase both our empirical knowledge of food issues and the understanding of general social-theoretical problems. This will not reduce food to a simple means of “studying something else,” but, on the contrary, will highlight the exceptionality of food issues. Second, such a commitment is exemplified in a particular theoretical direction. It is contended that food studies has been skewed toward research on the communicative aspects of food and eating (identity, cultural symbolism, social movement action, etc.), while increased engagements with contemporary theories of practice would provide the field with a broader diversity where the inconspicuous, ordinary, unreflective, mundane, and (more or less) unnoticed are given as much attention as the conspicuous, special, reflexive, extraordinary, and symbolically loaded.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?