Abstract:The concept of race has a complex history in the field of biological anthropology. Despite increased recognition of the racist origins of the discipline, there remains little agreement about what the concept means, how it is used, or how it is discussed. This study presents the results of a survey of biological anthropologists to investigate the relationship of biological anthropologists with race and ancestry. The survey focuses on the areas of research, public engagement, and teaching as related to these concepts. Results indicate that a large majority of biological anthropologists agree that race (as a social not biological concept) is separate from ancestry. The majority of respondents agreed that ancestry categories should be based on geography (e.g., Asian, European, and African), and more anthropologists thought the terms "Hispanic" and "Latino" were inappropriate ancestry categories. While most respondents felt that discussions of these terms were not matters of "political correctness," nearly a quarter of respondents suggested that concerns over the moral and ethical implications of research (e.g., photos, terminology, and ancestry) result in the silencing of anthropological research. Overwhelmingly, respondents felt that anthropologists have a responsibility to ensure the avoidance of misappropriation of their work by race science and by white nationalists/supremacists. Some differences in survey responses were found relating to respondents' subdiscipline, educational level, location, age, self-identified racial/ethnic categories, and gender. In regard to teaching, survey results indicate that these concepts are minimally covered in university classrooms. When taught, topics focus on the colonialist/racist history of anthropology, the presence of white privilege/supremacy, and racism. Based on the results of this survey, the authors argue for greater public engagement on these concepts, a standardized system of teaching race and ancestry, and a disciplinary conversation about practice and terminology. In this way, biological anthropologists can best place themselves to combat racism in a socially responsible way.

Against Teleology in the Study of Race: Toward the Abolition of the Progress Paradigm

“Without Losing Sight of the Concrete”: Critical and Metacritical Theories of Race

Organized abandonment under racial capitalism: Measuring accountable actors of structural racism for public health research and action

Dismantling Racism in Research Methods and Practices

Beyond Color-blindness: (Re) Theorizing Racial Ideology

The Colonial History of Systemic Racism: Insights for Psychological Science

Racial Experience as an Alternative Operationalization of Race

Through a Glass, Darkly: Systemic Racism, Affirmative Action, and Disproportionate Minority Contact

Deconstructing Racism and the White-Supremacist Practices Holding Social Welfare and Public Service Systems Hostage

Race as technology and the carceral methodologies of molecular racialization

The evolution of race and place in geographies of risk and resilience

Standing against racial capitalism: Reconsidering psychology's role in dismantling systemic racism.

The invention of race and the persistence of racial hierarchy: White privilege, White supremacy, and White colorblindness

The Future of American Blackness: On Colorism and Racial Reorganization

Social Agency and White Supremacy in Immigration Studies

Enslavement and the Foundations of Human Resource Development: Covert Learning, Consciousness Raising, and Resisting antiBlack Organizational Goals

Race, Capitalism, and the Necessity/Contingency Debate

Towards a Critical Race Methodology in Algorithmic Fairness

Perceptions of Race and Ancestry in Teaching, Research, and Public Engagement in Biological Anthropology

Networks, narratives and territory in anthropological race classification: towards a more comprehensive historical geography of Europe's culture

The Racist Anti‐Racism of American Anthropology