Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in various learning tasks, such as computer vision, natural language processing, and speech recognition. However, the fundamental theory of generalization still remains obscure in deep learning-why DNN models can generalize well, despite that they are heavily overparametrized in both depth and width? Recently, some work shows that traditional theory of analyzing the generalization error of learning models fails to explain the generalization of DNNs. The failure is mainly because of one simple fact that the worse case analysis of generalization error for learning models would be too loose for models with large parameter space, such as DNNs. In this work, we propose a new analysis of generalization in DNNs from an optimal transport perspective. Unlike traditional worse-case uniform convergence analysis in learning theory, our analysis of generalization error is dependent on both the learning algorithm and the data distribution and is the average-case analysis. Thus, our theory can be more practical and accurate to describe the generalization behavior of DNNs. More specifically, in this article, we try to answer a fundamental yet unsolved question in deep learning-why deeper models can generalize well than shallow models? The main contribution of this article can be summarized in four aspects. First, under a general learning framework, we derive upper bounds on the generalization error of learning algorithms by their algorithmic transport cost: the expected Wasserstein distance between the output hypothesis and the output hypothesis conditioned on an input example. We further provide several upper bounds on the algorithmic transport cost in terms of total variation distance, relative entropy, and Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension. Moreover, we also study different conditions for loss functions under which the generalization error of a learning algorithm can be upper bounded by different probability metrics between distributions relating to the output hypothesis and/or the input data. Finally, under our established framework, we obtain our main results, showing that the generalization error in DNNs decreases exponentially to zero as the number of layers increases.

Regularization theory in the study of generalization ability of a biological neural network model

The Efficacy of Regularization in Two Layer Neural Networks

Generalization Error Analysis of Neural networks with Gradient Based Regularization

Deep Network Regularization via Bayesian Inference of Synaptic Connectivity

Regularization Matters: Generalization and Optimization of Neural Nets v.s. their Induced Kernel

Penetrating the influence of regularizations on neural network based on information bottleneck theory

Traditional and Heavy-Tailed Self Regularization in Neural Network Models

Neuron with Steady Response Leads to Better Generalization

Consistency of Neural Networks with Regularization

Implicit Regularization in Deep Learning

Theory IIIb: Generalization in Deep Networks

Maximum Multiscale Entropy and Neural Network Regularization

Generalization and Estimation Error Bounds for Model-based Neural Networks

On Regularization for Explaining Graph Neural Networks: An Information Theory Perspective

Dropout Training, Data-dependent Regularization, and Generalization Bounds.

Regularization Matters: A Nonparametric Perspective on Overparametrized Neural Network

On Connections Between Regularizations for Improving DNN Robustness

The Regularization Effects of Anisotropic Noise in Stochastic Gradient Descent.

Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Deep Neural Networks

An Optimal Transport Analysis on Generalization in Deep Learning

Scaling description of generalization with number of parameters in deep learning