Current state of harmonization of domestic legislation in the field of protection of consumer rights with the legislation of the European Union

L.M. Shatalova
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2021.03.10
2022-02-20
Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence
Abstract:The current state of harmonization of Ukrainian legislation, which protects the rights and legitimate interests of consumers in distance trade is analyzed. The current state of electronic communication (interaction) between public authorities, businesses and consumers. Approaches to the formation of EU secondary legislation in the field of consumer policy are revealed. The first approach, based on the principle of full harmonization, increases the level of consumption, provides a high degree of consumers protection. Another one provides Member States with the right to go beyond consumer protection, and to maintain more strict national rules, which must comply with primary EU law. The expediency of creating an "E-buyer" platform for sellers who carry out business activities in online stores is argued. It is noted that the procedure of e-seller identification will simplify the identification of the seller at the stage of online shopping, should be free and carried out by the consumer himself online. The innovations of draft laws on consumer protection in the remote conclusion of contracts are described. Amendments to the legislation on establishing the right to apply to the competent authority on restrictions, restoring access to the website of the provider (owner or owner) of electronic communications services, where the information is posted, are proposed. The necessity to provide a warning mechanism in case of restriction of access to e-sellers' websites and to set a deadline for providing sellers with additional time (within two days) to correct their data is considered. It is suggested that requests to block websites should be sent to the provider (owner or owner) of electronic communications services. It is noted that the procedure for restricting and restoring access to information resources should be provided only by law.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?