Abstract:One driving factor for attention deployment towards a stimulus is its associated value due to previous experience and learning history. Previous visual search studies found that when looking for a target, distractors associated with higher reward produce more interference (e.g., longer response times). The present study investigated the neural mechanism of such value-driven attention deployment. Specifically, we were interested in which of the three attention sub-processes are responsible for the interference that was repeatedly observed behaviorally: enhancement of relevant information, attentional capture by irrelevant information, or suppression of irrelevant information. We replicated earlier findings showing longer response times and lower accuracy when a target competed with a high-reward compared to a low-reward distractor. We also found a spatial gradient of interference: behavioral performance dropped with increasing proximity to the target. This gradient was steeper for high- than low-reward distractors. Event-related potentials of the EEG signal showed the reason for the reward-induced attentional bias: High-reward distractors required more suppression than low-reward distractors as evident in larger Pd components. This effect was only found for distractors near targets, showing the additional filtering needs required for competing stimuli in close proximity. As a result, fewer attentional resources can be distributed to the target when it competes with a high-reward distractor, as evident in a smaller target-N2pc amplitude. The distractor-N2pc, indicative of attentional capture, was neither affected by distance nor reward, showing that attentional capture alone cannot explain interference by stimuli of high value. In sum our results show that the higher need for suppression of high-value stimuli contributes to reward-modulated attention deployment and increased suppression can prevent attentional capture of high-value stimuli.

Distraction Modulates Self-Referential Effects in the Processing of Monetary and Social Rewards

Evaluative Distractors Modulate Attentional Disengagement: People Would Rather Stay Longer on Rewards.

Taking Others as a Mirror: Contingent Social Comparison Promotes Task Engagement.

Toward Understanding the Role of Reward in Attentional Selection

Rewarding outcomes enhance attentional capture and delay attentional disengagement.

Stimuli That Signal the Availability of Reward Break into Attentional Focus.

Performance-dependent reward hurts performance: The non-monotonic attentional load modulation on task-irrelevant distractor processing

Impact of Relative and Absolute Values on Orienting Attention in Time.

Intertwining personal and reward relevance: evidence from the drift-diffusion model

Reward Breaks Through the Inhibitory Region Around Attentional Focus

The Temporal Dynamics of Attention: Thinking about Oneself Comes at a Cost in Sub-Clinical Depression but Not in Healthy Participants

Attentional Orientation Induced by Temporarily Established Self-Referential Cues

Differential neural processing of reward and self-relevance in a social gambling paradigm

To Reveal or Not to Reveal? Observation of Social Outcomes Facilitates Reward Processing

When "Your" reward is the same as "My" reward: Self-construal priming shifts neural responses to own vs. friends' rewards.

Reward-modulated attention deployment is driven by suppression, not attentional capture

Reward Association Facilitates Distractor Suppression in Human Visual Search

Neural correlates of reward-driven attentional capture in visual search

Working memory components modulation of attentional disengagement from evaluative distractor

Self-referential and social saliency information influences memory following attention orienting

The Impact of Reward Object on Object-Based Attention