Abstract:Avoidance and heightened responses to perceived threats are key features of anxiety disorders. These disorders are characterised by inflexibility in dynamically updating behavioural and physiological responses to aversively conditioned cues or environmental contexts which are no longer objectively threatening, often manifesting in perseverative avoidance. However, less is known about how anxiety disorders might differ in adjusting to threat and safety shifts in the environment or how idiosyncratic avoidance responses are learned and persist. Twenty-eight patients with generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), without DSM co-morbidities, and 27 matched healthy controls were administered two previously established paradigms: Pavlovian threat reversal and shock avoidance habits through overtraining (assessed following devaluation with measures of perseverative responding). For both tasks we used subjective report scales and skin conductance responses (SCR). In the Pavlovian threat reversal task, patients with GAD showed a significantly overall higher SCR as well as a reduced differential SCR response compared to controls in the early but not late reversal phase. During the test of habitual avoidance responding, GAD patients did not differ from controls in task performance, habitual active avoidance responses during devaluation, or corresponding SCR during trials, but showed a trend toward more abstract confirmatory subjective justifications for continued avoidance following the task. GAD patients exhibited significantly greater skin conductance responses to signals of threat than controls, but did not exhibit the major deficits in reversal and safety signal learning shown previously by patients with OCD. Moreover, this patient group, again unlike OCD patients, did not show evidence of altered active avoidance learning or enhanced instrumental avoidance habits. Overall, these findings indicate no deficits in instrumental active avoidance or persistent avoidance habits, despite enhanced responses to Pavlovian threat cues in GAD. They suggest that GAD is characterised by passive, and not excessively rigid, avoidance styles.

The role of trait anxiety in associative learning during and after an aversive event

Learning mechanisms underlying threat absence and threat relief: Influences of trait anxiety

Fear-Conditioning Mechanisms Associated with Trait Vulnerability to Anxiety in Humans

Examining the role of trait anxiety and attentional bias to negative information in intrusion vulnerability following an emotionally negative event

Aversive Learning in Adolescents: Modulation by Amygdala–Prefrontal and Amygdala–Hippocampal Connectivity and Neuroticism

Reduced risk-taking behavior as a trait feature of anxiety.

Fear learning activated anterior basolateral amygdala neurons modulate anxiety behaviors

Attentional bias to threat: an investigation of psychological predictors beyond trait anxiety

Anhedonia is associated with overgeneralization of conditioned fear during late adolescence and early adulthood

Genetic predisposition to anxiety-related behavior determines coping style, neuroendocrine responses, and neuronal activation during social defeat.

A psychological mechanism for the development of anxiety.

Neural correlates of trait anxiety in sensory processing and distractor filtering

From Pavlov to PTSD: the extinction of conditioned fear in rodents, humans, and anxiety disorders

Influence of Trait-Anxiety on Inhibition Function: Evidence from ERPs Study.

Higher threat avoidance costs reduce avoidance behaviour which in turn promotes fear extinction in humans

F20. Aversive Value Generalization During Human Avoidance Learning Predicts Anxiety

Threat Reversal Learning and Avoidance Habits in Generalised Anxiety Disorder

Role of the mesolimbic dopamine system in relief learning

A history of avoidance does not impact extinction learning in male rats

Pretrauma cognitive traits predict trauma-induced fear generalization and associated prefrontal functioning in a longitudinal model of posttraumatic stress disorder

The impact of past childhood adversity and recent life events on neural responses during fear conditioning