Abstract:While previous studies have examined front-line teachers' written feedback practices in second language (L2) writing classrooms, such studies tend to not take teachers' language and sociocultural backgrounds into consideration, which may mediate their performance in written feedback provision. Therefore, much remains to be known about how L2 writing teachers with different first languages (L1) enact written feedback. To fill this gap, we designed an exploratory study to examine native English-speaking (NES) and non-native English-speaking (NNES) (i.e., Chinese L1) teachers' written feedback practices in the Chinese tertiary context. Our study collected 80 English as a foreign language (EFL) students' writing samples with teacher written feedback and analyzed them from three aspects: Feedback scope, feedback focus, and feedback strategy. The findings of our study revealed that the two groups of teachers shared similar practices regarding feedback scope and feedback strategies. Both NES and NNES EFL teachers used a comprehensive approach to feedback provision, although NNES teachers provided significantly more feedback points than their NES peers and they delivered their feedback directly and indirectly. However, their practices differed greatly with regard to feedback focus. Specifically, when responding to EFL students' writing, NES teachers showed more concern with global issues (i.e., content and organization), whereas NNES teachers paid more attention to linguistic errors. With a surge in the recruitment of expatriate NES and local NNES English teachers in China and other EFL countries, our study is expected to make a contribution to a better understanding of the two groups of EFL teachers' pedagogical practices in written feedback provision and generate important implications for their feedback provision.

Teachers’ Corrective Feedback Strategies in Assessing Essay Writing

Written Corrective Feedback Strategies Employed by University English Lecturers: A Teacher Cognition Perspective

Teachers’ Written Corrective Feedback Strategies Through the Lens of the Students

Teachers’ Beliefs and Practice on Providing EFL Written Corrective Feedback

A typology of written corrective feedback types

Oral Corrective Feedback on L2 Writing from a Sociocultural Perspective

ESL Teachers’ Perceptions of Effective Classroom Assessment Feedback

Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy

Teachers Helping EFL Students Improve Their Writing Through Written Feedback: The Case of Native and Non-native English-Speaking Teachers' Beliefs

Oral corrective feedback: Pre-service English as a second language teachers’ beliefs and practices

EFL Learners’ Attitude towards Teacher’s and Peers’ Written Corrective Feedback

Medical School Students’ Preferences for and Perceptions of Teacher Written Corrective Feedback on English as a Second Language Academic Writing: An Intrinsic Case Study

How English teachers’ corrective feedback practices can promote second language acquisition in Intermediate Phase classrooms in South Africa: A case study

Strategies for teachers towards learners’errors

EFL Learners' Response to Teacher Written Feedback: An Exploratory Cross-case Analysis

Investigating EFL Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices about Written Corrective Feedback: A Large-scale Study

Teacher Written Feedback on English as a Foreign Language Learners' Writing: Examining Native and Nonnative English-Speaking Teachers' Practices in Feedback Provision

Oral corrective feedback in language teaching: A historical perspective

The Effect of Six Different Corrective Feedback Strategies on Iranian English Language Learners’ IELTS Writing Task 2

DO COMPREHENSIVE AND SELECTIVE CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK REALLY WORK FOR L2 WRITING ACCURACY? AN OVERVIEW FROM INDONESIAN CONTEXT

Teacher-Student Collaborative Assessment and Content-Based Instruction: A Case Study of English Writing at a Chinese University