Detection of fish sedimentary DNA in aquatic systems: A review of methodological challenges and future opportunities
Grayson P. Huston,Mark Louie D. Lopez,Yuanyu Cheng,Leighton King,Lucinda C. Duxbury,Maïlys Picard,Georgia Thomson‐Laing,Erika Myler,Caren C. Helbing,Michael T. Kinnison,Jasmine E. Saros,Irene Gregory‐Eaves,Marie‐Eve Monchamp,Susanna A. Wood,Linda Armbrecht,Gentile Francesco Ficetola,Lenka Kurte,Jordan Von Eggers,Janice Brahney,Genevieve Parent,Masayuki K. Sakata,Hideyuki Doi,Eric Capo,Jordan Von Eggers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.467
2023-08-29
Environmental DNA
Abstract:Substantial challenges remain for recovering the genetic material in sediments from macro‐organisms such as fish. In this review, we outline the biotic and abiotic factors affecting the production, persistence, and transport of fish DNA from the water column to the sediments, and address questions regarding the preservation of fish DNA in sediment. We identify sources of uncertainties around the recovery of fish sedDNA arising during the sedDNA workflow. Environmental DNA studies have proliferated over the last decade, with promising data describing the diversity of organisms inhabiting aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. The recovery of DNA present in the sediment of aquatic systems (sedDNA) has provided short‐ and long‐term data on a wide range of biological groups (e.g., photosynthetic organisms, zooplankton species) and has advanced our understanding of how environmental changes have affected aquatic communities. However, substantial challenges remain for recovering the genetic material of macro‐organisms (e.g., fish) from sediments, preventing complete reconstructions of past aquatic ecosystems, and limiting our understanding of historic, higher trophic level interactions. In this review, we outline the biotic and abiotic factors affecting the production, persistence, and transport of fish DNA from the water column to the sediments, and address questions regarding the preservation of fish DNA in sediment. We identify sources of uncertainties around the recovery of fish sedDNA arising during the sedDNA workflow. This includes methodological issues related to experimental design, DNA extraction procedures, and the selected molecular method (quantitative PCR, digital PCR, metabarcoding, metagenomics). By evaluating previous efforts (published and unpublished works) to recover fish sedDNA signals, we provide suggestions for future research and propose troubleshooting workflows for the effective detection and quantification of fish sedDNA. With further research, the use of sedDNA has the potential to be a powerful tool for inferring fish presence over time and reconstructing their population and community dynamics.