Abstract:The authors draw on case studies of change-oriented school leadership and on other research to promote a discussion of how administrator preparation must change if we are to meet children's needs. Most programs for training school administrators range in quality from embarrassing to disastrous.[1] THE EDUCATIONAL challenge of the 21st century is to achieve higher levels of learning for all children. To attain this all, public school teachers and administrators must undertake changes that are specifically and significantly directed toward that end. While it is well-recognized that schools now serve linguistically, racially, and ethnically diverse student populations, educational administration programs have not responded to this diversity of needs. Daniel Griffiths, a long-time observer of educational administration whose words appear at the beginning of this article, may be more direct and damning of current preparation programs than are most commentators. However, he is not alone in his concern about the quality of programs and the implications of that quality for public education. Even though the reform of administration preparation programs has been debated and discussed since 1987,[2] to our knowledge there have been no fundamental changes in such programs, but only isolated initiatives that have refined components of existing programs.[3] One possible reason for the inertia found in both initial preparation and continuing professional development programs for principals and superintendents is the absence of models of change-oriented leadership. Recent research and development at the National Center for School Leadership (NCSL) at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign,[4] has focused on conceptions of leadership within changing environments and on case studies of current administrators who have reputations for success in such environments. In this article we will draw on this research to promote a discussion of how administrator preparation must change if we are to meet children's needs. At NCSL we embrace a specialized view of leadership throughout our research programs, while acknowledging that no one particular form of leadership is effective in every imaginable situation. Similarly, our conceptions of leadership and leaders are inherently tied to the nature of relationships between school leaders, school culture and climate, and the community the school serves. Position titles and job descriptions do not define qualities of effective leaders. Rather, the processes the participants engage in when presented with specific educational problems are what characterize their effectiveness. One fundamental issue that runs through all our work is the degree to which leaders can initiate, nurture, and maintain changes that benefit students. This basic theme led us to develop four postulates as essential elements of change-oriented leadership that benefits students: 1. Leaders for change are transformational and engage in relationships with school personnel that inspire all participants to accept and accomplish goals that rise above self-interest. 2. Leaders for change create collaborative, inclusive decision-making processes. 3. Leaders for change are oriented toward continuous learning; they believe that the school's context partially defines the school's needs and thus that responses to those needs must be tailored to the school's context. 4. Leaders for change use a variety of student outcomes to evaluate the effects of improvement efforts.[5] To test these postulates, we began four case studies of schools whose principals and teachers had local and national reputations for commitment to and progress toward change. We examined the claim of progress at each of these schools. Once we were able to determine that student benefits had occurred, we then studied the four schools to better understand how their principals and teachers managed to effect change within their buildings. …

Changing of the Guard: How Different School Leaders Change Organizational Routines

Constancy and Change in Work Practice in Schools: The Role of Organizational Routines

Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change

Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change

An Experimental Study on Firm Organizational Change,HR Strategy and Change Coping Behaviour: an Organizational Learning Perspective

Preparing Leaders for Change-Oriented Schools.

Organizational Change in Schools

The Persistence of Flexible Organizational Routines: The Role of Agency and Organizational Context

Taking Charge of Early Childhood Transitions: Preventing Challenging Behaviors Through Engaging Routines

Is Role Change Enough? District Organizational Supports for Principal Supervision

Resist or Comply: The Power Dynamics of Organizational Routines during Mergers

Study of the Process of Routineschange-based Strategic Change

Making change permanent A model for institutionalizing change interventions

Laying train tracks en route: How institutional education leaders navigate complexity during mandated curriculum change

Leading Equity Teams: The Role of Formal Leaders in Building Organizational Capacity for Equity

Challenges in Implementing and Sustaining Community College Organizational Change for Student Success

From Compliance to Improvement: How School Leaders Make Sense of Institutional and Technical Demands When Implementing a Continuous Improvement Process

High school change: a reflective essay on three decades of frustration, struggle and progress

A Behavioral Approach to Organizational Change: Reinforcing Those Responsible for Facilitating the Climate and Hence Promoting Diversity

Navigating Change: Exploring the Dynamic Role of Educational Leadership in Advancing Chinese Schools

Is a principal still a teacher?: US women administrators’ accounts of role conflict and role discontinuity