Abstract:To maximise running economy (RE), shoe manufacturers placed carbon plates within the midsole of shoes. Shoe technology research is limited on understanding the variability of individual responses to carbon-plated shoes and how these responses vary across running velocities. Little research on same shoe characteristics with and without a stiff element has been completed. This study aimed to investigate how running shoes with carbon versus without a carbon composite stiff element alter individual running biomechanics and the metabolic cost of running. Ethical approval was gained from Cardiff Metropolitan University Ethics Committee. Ten male athletes (69 ± 9 kg; 174 ± 4 cm; 28 ± 9 years) completed two submaximal incremental treadmill runs. One test was completed in a shoe without carbon (C1), the other test was completed in carbon shoes (C2), the order of testing for each shoe were randomised. Running velocity started at 9 km/h and increased by 1 km/h every four mins, blood lactate samples were taken after every stage. Once 4 mmol·L−1 (OBLA; the second lactate turn point) had been reached one more stage was completed. Gas exchange was analysed throughout the whole test. The first 15 s of the final 2 minutes of each stage was recorded using Theia3D markerless motion capture software (Theia3Dv2022.1.0.2309, Theia Markerless, Inc., Kingston, ON, Canada). Data were analysed in 4 stages, the initial stage, pre-OBLA, OBLA and post-OBLA. Physiology data were averaged over the final two mins of each stage. Discrete joint angles were taken from each stage, and an average of the 15 s recording was taken for spatiotemporal measure. Data were analysed using a four-way repeat measures ANOVA, to show individual differences. Non-parametric data were analysed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Hedges g calculations were completed to calculate effect size (ES). Results showed significant increase in flight time (FT; P = 0.04, ES = 0.20) in the pre-OBLA stage when using C2. Metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP) dorsiflexion showed significant increase during the initial stage in C2 (P = 0.05, ES = 0.8), and ankle dorsiflexion had significant increase in the post-OBLA stage in C2 (P = 0.03, ES = 0.2). The were no significant differences present in the physiology data. Across the physiological, spatiotemporal and kinematics, high dispersions around the mean were exhibited. Findings suggest that to improve RE, mechanical and spatiotemporal changes need to be present when using C2. Further findings show carbon shoes elicit highly individual responses to both RE and mechanics of running.

The effect of torsional shoe sole stiffness on knee moment and gross efficiency in cycling

The Effects of Increased Midsole Bending Stiffness of Sport Shoes on Muscle-Tendon Unit Shortening and Shortening Velocity: a Randomised Crossover Trial in Recreational Male Runners

Influence of altered torsional stiffness through sole modification of air pressure shoes on lower extremity biomechanical behaviour during side-step cutting maneuvers

Influence of shoe torsional stiffness on foot and ankle biomechanics during tennis forehand strokes

The Effects of Cycling Shoe Stiffness on Forefoot Pressure

Increasing the longitudinal bending stiffness of runners’ habitual shoes: An appropriate choice for improving running performance?

The influence of gearing footwear on running biomechanics

Increasing the midsole bending stiffness of shoes alters gastrocnemius medialis muscle function during running

No Effect of Cycling Shoe Outsole Stiffness On Sub- and Supra-Maximal Cycling Performance Parameters.

Shoe midsole longitudinal bending stiffness and running economy, joint energy, and EMG

Individual physiological responses to changes in shoe bending stiffness: a cluster analysis study on 96 runners

The Influence of Footwear Longitudinal Bending Stiffness on Running Economy and Biomechanics in Older Runners

How athletes’ biomechanical running characteristics effect running economy during the use of running shoes with and without carbon inserts

The Impact of Running Experience and Shoe Longitudinal Bending Stiffness on Lower Extremity Biomechanics

Adding carbon fiber to shoe soles may not improve running economy: a muscle-level explanation

Impact Of Footwear Bending Stiffness On Lower-Limb Work Redistribution And Running Economy

THE EFFECTS OF CYCLING SHOE OUTSOLE MATERIAL ON PLANTAR STRESS

Modulation of Internal Tissue Stresses of the Knee Via Control of Variable-Stiffness Properties in a 3D-Printed Footwear: A Combined Experimental and Finite Element Analysis

Effects of longitudinal bending stiffness and midsole foam on running energetics

Lower impact forces but greater burden for the musculoskeletal system in running shoes with greater cushioning stiffness

Increasing Shoe Longitudinal Bending Stiffness Is Not Beneficial to Reduce Energy Cost During Graded Running