Persistence of Activist Short-Sellers’ Performance
Danqi Hu,Beverly R.Walther
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3807665
2024-01-01
Abstract:In this study,we examine persistence in the performance of activist short sellers in identifying firms to short.In contrast to prior work on mutual funds and security analysts,we first document that the average market-adjusted return of an activist's past targets does not predict the return of his/her current campaign target.Rather,we find evidence that the activist's past track record in identifying firms that delist predicts the likelihood that the target of the current campaign will delist.This finding holds even in a subsample of activists that survive.The evidence suggests that superior activist short sellers possess the consistent skill/ability to identify firms that delist,despite the lack of consistency in predicting targets'cumulative returns in pre-specified return accumulation windows.These seemingly conflicting results are nonetheless consistent with anecdotes that it is very difficult to consistently time shorts correctly due to the uncertainty when prices will incorporate the bad news. Consistent with persistence in the delisting measure of campaign performance,we find that investors react more negatively on the publication date to campaigns initiated by activists with a greater percentage of past targets that delist.We find that this more negative reaction is concentrated on the day the campaign is initiated;the market-adjusted return in the week or month after the publication date is not associated with the activist's past performance.Further,we provide preliminary evidence that there is a greater increase in the aggregate short interest before campaigns announced by activists with a superior record in identifying firms that delist.This result suggests the short side as a whole(activist short sellers,their clients,and/or friends)is able to capitalize off superior activists'greater market reputation.This ability in turn provides an incentive for activist short sellers to maintain their reputation for superior performance. Finally,we investigate whether performance persistence varies with activists'tenure.We first document that the likelihood that an activist leaves the profession is more sensitive to past performance in the early years of his/her career,providing greater incentives for activists to perform well initially.Consistent with this result,we find that performance persistence is higher in the early years and declines as tenure increases,even after we correct for survivorship bias.Despite this decline in persistence with tenure,we do not observe that the market reaction to past performance varies with tenure.The evidence is consistent with activists'establishing a reputation when they first enter the profession,and either working less or becoming more opportunistic once experienced,e.g.,once their reputations reach very high levels as in Benabou and Laroque(1992).Overall,the paper sheds light on the behavior of activist short sellers and has broader implications in understanding the new form of information intermediary in which investors act as intermediaries for each other.