Abstract:Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to improve the measurement of nominal level and actual strength of China's intellectual property protection (IPP), and examine whether the increase of actual protection strength (APS) is positive or negative impact on China's provincial economic growth. Design/methodology/approach - A modified approach, based on Ginarte-Park's (GP's) and HL's approaches, is used to measure nominal level and APS of China's intellectual property rights (IPR) from 1995 to 2007. The pooled EGLS method (cross-section fixed effect) is used to estimate the effect of China's IPP and other variables on provincial economic growth. Findings - The paper proves that China's APS appears an increase with a phase. China's IPP level by GP approach is on the high side, whereas China's IPP level by HL approach is slightly on the low side. Nominal level of China's IPP is largely influenced by the legislation level, whereas APS mostly embodies the effect of implementing law level. The increase of China's APS has significant positive impact on provincial economic growth. However, at the outset of building an independent innovation country, too strong IPP is bad for the development of innovation capability, and bad for provincial economic growth. Research limitations/implications - Because the APS is unknown, it is impossible to use APS as the dependent variable to estimate the weights of the main influencing factors. The method that the paper assumes three main factors the same weights is second best choice. Thus, several different weights are supplemented to measure the distribution values of China's APS. Practical implications - China's APS quantified by a modified approach and strong evidences can be used to estimate the effect on economic growth. Policy effectiveness could be maximized at seeking the endogenous benefit balance between strengthening IPP and promoting economic development. Originality/value - The paper proposes a modified approach to measure the APS of China's IPR, and proves that the reinforcement of China's APS is beneficial to promoting provincial economic growth. However, at the outset, too strong IPP is harmful. Keywords Intellectual property, Economic growth, Knowledge management, Intellectual property law, China Paper type Research paper

Intellectual property protection and creative enterprises’ investment efficiency: alleviating financing constraints or inhibiting agency problem?

Intellectual Property Pledge Financing and Enterprise Innovation: Based on the Perspective of Signal Incentive

A Study on the Impact of Intellectual Property Protection on Regional Innovation Efficiency Based on Mediation Effects: Evidence from China

Impact of intellectual property protection on the innovation efficiency in China’s hi-tech industry

How does intellectual property protection contribute to the digital transformation of enterprises?

Intellectual property protection and enterprise innovation: Evidence from China

Intellectual Property Protection, Financial Innovation and Corporate Innovation: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China

Intellectual property protection, infringement disputes, and, corporate innovation investment persistence

Can intellectual property protection promote domestic value added in exports? Evidence from mainland China

Does social capital alleviate financing constraints? A study of China’s creative economy

Does intellectual property protection promote green innovation in firms? A perspective on R&D spillovers and financing constraints

Insight into the nexus between intellectual property pledge financing and enterprise innovation: A systematic analysis with multidimensional perspectives

Political Connections As an Impediment to Chinese Firms’ Innovation? A Motivation–Opportunity–Ability Perspective

Strategizing Intellectual Property Rights for Enhanced Innovation: the Moderating Effects of R&D and FDI in China's Regional Context

The impact of intellectual property rights protection on green innovation: A quasi-natural experiment based on the pilot policy of the Chinese intellectual property court

University-Industry Cooperation and Regional Economic Convergence: The Moderating Role of Intellectual Property Protection

Does Stronger Protection of Intellectual Property Improve Sustainable Development? Evidence from City Data in China

Productivity Performance and Investment Efficiency of China's Private Enterprises

How do intellectual property system affect technology entrepreneurship: evidence from Chinese prefecture‐level cities

Nominal level and actual strength of China's intellectual property protection under TRIPS agreement

The impact of intellectual property protection on the development of digital economy and regional entrepreneurial activity: Evidence from small and medium enterprises