Phylogenetic systematics and evolution of the spider infraorder Mygalomorphae using genomic scale data

Vera Opatova,Chris A. Hamilton,Marshal Hedin,Laura Montes de Oca,Jiří Král,Jason E. Bond
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/531756
2019-01-27
Abstract:A bstract The Infraorder Mygalomorphae is one of the three main lineages of spiders comprising over 3,000 nominal species. This ancient group has a world-wide distribution that includes among its ranks large and charismatic taxa such as tarantulas, trapdoor spiders, and highly venomous funnel web spiders. Based on past molecular studies using Sanger-sequencing approaches, numerous mygalomorph families (e.g., Hexathelidae, Ctenizidae, Cyrtaucheniidae, Dipluridae and Nemesiidae) have been identified as non-monophyletic. However, these data were unable to sufficiently resolve the higher-level (intra- and interfamilial) relationships such that the necessary changes in classification could be made with confidence. Here we present the most comprehensive phylogenomic treatment of the spider infraorder Mygalomorphae conducted to date. We employ 472 loci obtained through Anchored Hybrid Enrichment to reconstruct relationships among all the mygalomorph spider families and estimate the timeframe of their diversification. We performed an extensive generic sampling of all currently recognized families, which has allowed us to assess their status, and as a result, propose a new classification scheme. Our generic-level sampling has also provided an evolutionary framework for revisiting questions regarding silk use in mygalomorph spiders. The first such analysis for the group within a strict phylogenetic framework shows that a sheet web is likely the plesiomorphic condition for mygalomorphs, as well as providing hints to the ancestral foraging behavior for all spiders. Our divergence time estimates, concomitant with detailed biogeographic analysis, suggest that both ancient continental-level vicariance and more recent dispersal events have played an important role in shaping modern day distributional patterns. Based on our results, we relimit the generic composition of the Ctenizidae, Cyrtaucheniidae, Dipluridae and Nemesiidae. We also elevate five subfamilies to family rank: Anamidae (NEW RANK), Euagridae (NEW RANK), Ischnothelidae (NEW RANK), Pycnothelidae (NEW RANK), and Bemmeridae (NEW RANK). The three families Hermachidae (NEW FAMILY), Microhexuridae (NEW FAMILY), and Stasimopidae (NEW FAMILY) are newly proposed. Such a major rearrangement in classification, recognizing eight newly established family-level rank taxa, is the largest the group has seen in over three decades since Raven’s (1985) taxonomic treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?