Abstract:Purpose This paper sets out to examine the use of institutional theory in information systems research. It also seeks to consider recent debates within information systems, that the field should develop its own social theories. The purpose of the paper is to demonstrate that IS researchers need to engage more fully with the institutional theory literature as the body of work is conceptually rich and is more appropriately used to analyse and understand complex social phenomena. Design/methodology/approach Reviewing the institutionalist literature from the field of IS, the paper shows that most accounts engage in empirically testing institutionalist concepts, rather than analysing the richness of these concepts to further develop and build the theory. Findings The paper finds that most institutionalist accounts within information systems research adopt an organisational unit of analysis as opposed to a multi‐level approach which encompasses societal and individual levels. Research further shows more studies on the “effects” of institutionalism than on the “processual” accounts. Research limitations/implications It is argued that information systems researchers need to become more aware of the wider debates within the institutional theory literature, particularly as the theory is conceptually ambiguous, yet not amenable to over‐simplification as a means to achieve methodological rigour. Practical implications The use of institutional theory offers practitioners conceptual tools and techniques for understanding complex change management scenarios relating to IS work. Originality/value The paper contributes to the IS literature through reviewing the range of studies using institutional theory. It illustrates the narrow use of the theory adopted by the IS community and suggests that a more fruitful approach is to use a wider multi‐level and multi‐method approach. The paper suggests that institutional theory offers a conceptually rich lens for analysing IS themes and issues and encourages further use of the theory for IS and management research.

Relevance Versus Rigor in IS Research: Need to Introduce A New Institution

Relevance and Rigor in International Business Teaching: Using the CSA-FSA Matrix

The Declining Relevance and Legitimacy of IB Scholarship in a World That Really Needs It

Analyzing a practitioner perspective on relevance of published empirical research in Requirements Engineering

Axiomatic Theories And Improving The Relevance Of Information Systems Research

Contextualising the IT artefact: towards a wider research agenda for IS using institutional theory

How do Practitioners Perceive the Relevance of Requirements Engineering Research? An Ongoing Study

RELEVANCE: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science

Making academic research more relevant: A few suggestions

Rigor and Relevance in Asian Management Research: Where Are We and Where Can We Go?

Research in Information Systems Education: Scope and Productivity

The Relevance of Organization Theory to the Field of Business and Information Systems Engineering

A Balance of Rigor and Relevance: Engaged Scholarship in Organizational Change

What makes entrepreneurship research interesting? Reflections on strategies to overcome the rigour–relevance gap

Practical relevance of software engineering research: Synthesizing the community's voice

Three Questions to Guide Study and Practice in the Information Systems Field

Between Sweet Harmony and a Clash of Cultures: Does a Joint Academic–Practitioner Review Reconcile Rigor and Relevance?

Rigour versus relevance for purchasing trends and processes : An analysis of how research trends and business needs are in line

Managers As Researchers: Bridging the Relevance Gap

New institutional theory and AI: toward rethinking of artificial intelligence in organizations

Methodological Rigor and Theoretical Foundations of CS Education Research