Effects of intermittent fasting and energy-restricted diets on lipid profile: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Haiyan Meng,Lei Zhu,Hamed Kord-Varkaneh,Heitor O Santos,Grant M Tinsley,Peng Fu,Grant M. Tinsley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2020.110801
IF: 4.893
2020-09-01
Nutrition
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">BACKGROUND</h3><p>To the best of our knowledge, no systematic review and meta-analysis has evaluated the cholesterol-lowering effects of intermittent fasting (IF) and energy-restricted diets (ERD) compared with control groups.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">OBJECTIVE</h3><p>The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the effects of controlled clinical trials examining the influence of IF and ERD on lipid profiles.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">METHODS</h3><p>A systematic review of four independent databases (PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar) was performed to identify clinical trials reporting the effects of IF or ERD, relative to non-diet controls, on lipid profiles in humans. A random-effects model, employing the method of DerSimonian and Laird, was used to evaluate effect sizes, and results were expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity between studies was calculated using Higgins I<sup>2</sup>, with values ≥50% considered to represent high heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were performed to examine the influence of intervention type, baseline lipid concentrations, degree of energy deficit, sex, health status and intervention duration.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">RESULTS</h3><p>For the outcomes of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG), there were 34, 33, 35, and 33 studies meeting all inclusion criteria, respectively. Overall, results from the random-effects model indicated that IF and ERD interventions resulted significant changes in TC (WMD: -6.93 mg/dL, 95% CI: -10.18, -3.67, p <0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 78.2%), LDL-C (WMD: -6.16 mg/dL, 95% CI: -8.42, -3.90, p ˂0.001; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 52 %), and TG concentrations (WMD: -6.46 mg/dL, 95% CI: -10.64, -2.27, p = 0.002; <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 61%). HDL-C concentrations did not change significantly following IF or ERD (WMD: 0.50 mg/dL, 95% CI: -0.69, 1.70, p = 0.411; I<sup>2</sup> = 80%). Subgroup analyses indicated potentially differential effects between subgroups for one or more lipid parameter in the majority of analyses.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">CONCLUSION</h3><p>Relative to a non-diet control, IF and ERD are effective for the improvement of circulating TC, LDL-C and TG concentrations, but have no meaningful effects on HDL-C concentration. These effects are influenced by several factors which may inform clinical practice and future research. The present results suggest that these dietary practices are a means of enhancing the lipid profile in humans.</p>
nutrition & dietetics