Abstract:Background: Publicly funded healthcare forms an intricate part of government spending in most Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, because of its reliance on entitlements and dedicated revenue streams. The impact of budgetary rules and procedures on publicly funded health care might thus be different from other spending categories. In this study we focus on the potential of fiscal rules to contain these costs and their design features. Methods: We assess the relationship between fiscal rules and the level of public health care expenditure of 32 (OECD) countries between 1985 and 2014. Our dataset consists of health care expenditure data of the OECD and data on fiscal rules of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for that same period. Through a multivariate regression analysis, we estimate the association between fiscal rules and its subcategories and inflation adjusted public health care expenditure. We control for population, Gross Domestic Product (GDP), debt and whether countries received an IMF bailout for the specific period. In all our regressions we include country and year fixed effects. Results: The presence of a fiscal rule on average is associated with a 3 % reduction of public health care expenditure. Supranational balanced budget rules are associated with some 8 % lower expenditure. Health service provision-oriented countries with more passive purchasing structures seem less capable of containing costs through fiscal rules. Fiscal rules demonstrate lagged effectiveness; the potential for expenditure reduction increases after one and two years of fiscal rule implementation. Finally, we find evidence that fiscal frameworks that incorporate multi-year expenditure ceilings show additional potential for cost control. Conclusions: Our study shows that there seems a clear relationship between the potential of fiscal rules and budgeting health expenses. Using fiscal rules to contain the level of health care expenditure can thus be a necessary precondition for successful strategies for cost control.

Developing an index of EX-POST parliamentary oversight of public finance

Independent Fiscal Institutions: Developing Good Practices

The Swedish-Norwegian Experience of Increased Budget Control Due to Hierarchical Budget Reforms in their National Parliaments

Ministerial Autonomy, Parliamentary Scrutiny and Government Reform Output in Parliamentary Democracies

The 'Eyes and Ears of Parliament': devolved public accounts committees in the UK

Overton -- A bibliometric database of policy document citations

Constitutional analysis: The power index approach

DOES PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY WORK? AN ASSESSMENT TOOL

Do independent fiscal institutions cause better fiscal outcomes in the European Union?

Fiscal rules, powerful levers for controlling the health budget? Evidence from 32 OECD countries

The impact of austerity on policy capacity in local government

On the Parliamentary Investigative Power and Its Limits

The impact of expenditure rules on budgetary discipline over the cycle

THE ROLE OF PARLIAMENT IN THE BUDGET PROCESS

Unintended institutionalization: how the politics of symbolic fiscal practices shapes economic policy

Can local People's Congress supervision improve the expenditure behavior of local governments? Evidence from provincial budget review

Termites of Solidarity in the House of Austerity: Undermining Fiscal Governance in the European Union

Measuring Policy Capacity Through Governance Indices

Editorial: Spending reviews and the evolution of South African public finance management reforms

Democracy, Elections and Government Budget Deficits

Gender budgeting in public financial management: a literature review and research agenda