Abstract:Background: Depression is a mental health disorder characterized by affective, somatic, and cognitive symptoms. Attention bias modification (ABM) has been widely used to treat depression. However, the results seem inconsistent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of ABM for depression and to explore the optimal protocol of ABM. Methods: Seven databases were systematically searched from their inceptions to 5 October 2022 to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ABM for depression. Two independent reviewers selected the eligible articles, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias using version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB 2.0) for randomized trials. The primary outcome was the evaluation of depressive symptoms using widely accepted and validated scales. The secondary outcomes included rumination and attentional control. Meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan (version 5.4) and Stata (version 12.0). Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were performed to identify the source of heterogeneity. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: A total of 19 trials involving 20 datasets (1,262 participants) were included. The overall risk of bias in one study was rated as low risk of bias, three studies were considered as high, and the remaining studies were some concerns. Compared with attention control training (ACT), ABM had a greater effect in the improvement of depression (SMD = −0.48, 95% CI −0.80 to −0.17, I 2 = 82%) and rumination (MD = −3.46, 95% CI −6.06 to −0.87, I 2 = 0%). No significant differences were observed in the attentional control outcome between ABM and ACT (MD = 3.07, 95% CI −0.52 to 6.65, I 2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that adults exhibited a greater decrease in depression scores than adolescents. ABM using the dot-probe task, training target stimulus presented by face, and training directions by left–right were associated with better antidepressant effects. ABM training delivered in the laboratory tended to yield a better effect than those conducted at home. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the results were robust. The certainty of the evidence for all outcomes was low or very low, and publication bias may exist. Conclusion: Due to high heterogeneity and limited studies, not enough current evidence supported that ABM could be an effective intervention to relieve depressive symptoms. More rigorous RCTs are required to verify the benefits and to explore the optimal protocol of ABM training for depression. Systematic Review Registration: [PROSPERO], identifier [No. CRD42021279163].

Attention Bias Modification in Remitted Depression Is Associated With Increased Interest and Leads to Reduced Adverse Impact of Anxiety Symptoms and Negative Cognition

Attentional bias modification is associated with fMRI response toward negative stimuli in individuals with residual depression: a randomized controlled trial

The effect of attentional bias modification on positive affect dynamics

Efficacy of Attention Bias Modification in Individuals with Depression:a Meta-analysis

Inhibition moderates the effect of attentional bias modification for reducing residual depressive symptoms: A randomized sham-controlled clinical trial

Attentional bias modification (ABM) training induces spontaneous brain activity changes in young women with subthreshold depression: a randomized controlled trial.

Attention bias modification for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Neuroplastic changes in anterior cingulate cortex gray matter volume and functional connectivity following attention bias modification in high trait anxious individuals

Attentional bias for negative, positive, and threat words in current and remitted depression

Attention bias at baseline does not moderate the effect of attention bias modification for depressive symptoms

Beyond the modified dot-probe task: A meta-analysis of the efficacy of alternate attention bias modification tasks across domains

Does attention bias modification reduce anxiety in socially anxious college students? An experimental study of potential moderators and considerations for implementation

Negative and positive attention bias in anhedonia and anxious arousal: Can depression and anxiety be distinguished by patterns of engagement and disengagement bias?

Training Gains and Losses: Their Link with Treatment Effects of Attention Bias Modification for Anxiety

Internet-Based Attention Bias Modification for Social Anxiety: A Randomised Controlled Comparison of Training towards Negative and Training Towards Positive Cues

Neural activation changes following attention bias modification treatment or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor for social anxiety disorder

A neuromarker of clinical outcome in attention bias modification therapy for social anxiety disorder

Attention Bias Modification (ABM): Review of Effects of Multisession ABM Training on Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention in High-Anxious Individuals

A review of attentional bias modification trainings for depression.

Attentional Bias Modification in Reducing Test Anxiety Vulnerability: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Online attention modification for social anxiety disorder: replication of a randomized controlled trial