Randomized, single‐blinded, crossover study of a novel wound dressing vs current clinical practice after percutaneous collagen induction therapy

Michael H. Gold,Julie Biron,Brynne Thompson RN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12872
2019-02-12
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
Abstract:<div class="abstract-group"> <section class="article-section article-section__abstract" lang="en" data-lang="en" id="section-1-en"> <h3 class="article-section__header main abstractlang_en main">Summary</h3> <div class="article-section__content en main"> <div class="article-section__content" id="jocd12872-sec-0001"> <h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Introduction</h3> <p>Skin rejuvenation procedures have become common with sophisticated technologies with reduced downtime and related risks. Recently, microneedling has been paired with radiofrequency to create Fractional Radiofrequency Microneedling (FRFM) to induce neocollagenesis. Frequently, topical products are applied immediately after the needling. This procedure is known as percutaneous collagen induction therapy (PCIT). Postoperative topical wound care is critical for prompt rapid and safe healing, with moist wound healing deemed of primary importance for fast and correct scarring process. An ideal dressing enables a moist environment while reducing postprocedural inflammatory responses in the first stages of wound healing.</p>
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?