Abstract:According to Swiss Re, there are currently approximately 180 urban disasters globally per year. Hurricane Katrina demonstrated the vulnerability of cities and the ability of humans to exacerbate the magnitude and intensity of man-made and/or natural hazards. The changes produced after a disaster can imply multiple adverse impacts including health risks, disruption to energy and water supply, and ecological imbalances. Post-disaster reconstruction, in this context, provides not only the necessity for a community to return to its pre-disaster state, but as Burby states, a “window of opportunity” to enhance resilience, and, in essence, to ‘regenerate’. These ‘windows of opportunity’ allow exploration to plan more globally, assess community social viability, foster adaptation and examine the technical issues of flooding, retrofits, location, and building energy efficiency. The multiple dimensions of resilience in urban settings are paramount to preserving community stability, as well as long-term sustainability. The concept of resilient design and planning uses both technical and social strategies to increase a community’s resilience. Post-disaster environments must address structural-technical issues (such as sea levels, proximity to major infrastructure, and quality of infrastructure) and social issues (such as community participation, policy and integrated design processes) that are vital for a community’s long-term survival. In this instance, community participation is vital both during the planning process and at the level of the individual project. Drawing from post-disaster reconstruction New Orleans, and in particular the Make It Right project, this paper evaluates the ways in which resilient design and planning are put into action. This article will consider the links between regenerative design and resilience at the three scales of building, neighborhood, and city, focusing on the process of the design approach, and impacts on resilience, “regeneration,” and on collective action. In addition, it examines how design for a built environment that has ecological, social and infrastructural resiliencies contributes positively to human and natural systems, and reduces vulnerability. This paper concludes with a comprehensive set of criteria that can be used to evaluate whether a built environment supports resilience and “regeneration” in both the short- and long-term. As the issues of short and long-term resilience will expand, so will the need to revise the criteria from which sustainability will continue to emerge.

The right to the resilient city: progressive politics and the green growth machine in New York City

Resilient and regenerative design in New Orleans: the case of the Make It Right project

Disaster and the lived politics of the resilient city

Shifting urban design paradigms in the development of two New York projects: Battery Park City and Hudson Yards

Urban Ecosystem Services for Resilience Planning and Management in New York City

Making nature into infrastructure: The construction of oysters as a risk management solution in New York City

Urban resilience against environmental disasters: Comparing Lagos and New York

From landscapes of utopia to the margins of the green urban life

Protection of New York City Urban Fabric With Low-Cost Textile Storm Surge Barriers

Biodiversity, biosphere reserves, and the Big Apple: a study of the New York Metropolitan Region

A green infrastructure spatial planning model for evaluating ecosystem service tradeoffs and synergies across three coastal megacities

"Upheaval": Unpacking the dynamic balance between place attachment and social capital in disaster recovery

Participation as a Global Urban Strategy Towards Resilience

Grassroots mobilization for a just, green urban future: Building community infrastructure against green gentrification and displacement

Placing Urban Renewal in the Context of the Resilience Adaptive Cycle

Building More Resilient Communities

Green Structural Adjustment in the World Bank’s Resilient City

Sustainable urban design: The role of green buildings in shaping resilient cities

The Social, Political, and Environmental Dimensions in Designing Urban Public Space from a Water Management Perspective: Testing European Experiences

Risk capital: Urban political ecology and entanglements of financial and environmental risk in Washington, D.C.

The effects of urban development and current green infrastructure policy on future climate change resilience