Abstract:Using a generalized cross-spectral approach, we propose a model-free omnibus statistical procedure to check whether the direction of changes in an economic variable is predictable using the history of its past changes. A class of separate inference procedures are also given to gauge possible sources of directional predictability. They can reveal information about whether the direction of future changes is predictable using the direction, level, volatility, skewness, and kurtosis of past changes. An important feature of the proposed procedures is that they check many lags simultaneously, which is particularly suitable for detecting the alternatives whose directional dependence is small at each lag but it carries over a long distributional lag. At the same time, the tests naturally discount higher order lags, which is consistent with the conventional wisdom that financial markets are more influenced by the recent past events than by the remote past events. We apply the proposed procedures to four daily U.S. stock price indices. We find overwhelming evidence that the directions of excess stock returns are predictable using past excess stock returns, and the evidence is stronger for the directional predictability of large excess stock returns. In particular, the direction and level of past excess stock returns can be used to predict the direction of future excess stock returns with any threshold, and the volatility, skewness and kurtosis of past excess stock returns can be used to predict the direction of future excess stock returns with nonzero thresholds (i.e., large returns). The well-known strong volatility clustering together with weak serial dependence in mean cannot completely explain all documented directional predictability for stock returns. To exploit the economic significance of the documented directional predictability for stock returns, we consider a class of autologit models for directional forecasts and find that they have significant out-of-sample directional predictive power. Some trading strategies based on these models and their combinations can earn significant out-of-sample extra risk-adjusted returns over the buy-and-hold trading strategy

Can Stock Analysts Predict Market Risk? New Evidence from Copula Theory

Tail Risk and Expected Stock Returns Around the World

Are the Directions of Stock Price Changes Predictable ? Statistical Theory and Evidence

Relationship Between Credit Risk and Market Value of Listed Companies Based on Copula Method

Analysis of Systemic Risk among Industries via Dynamic Factor Copulas

Posterior Probability Model For Stock Return Prediction Based On Analyst'S Recommendation Behavior

Risk Analysis of Continuously Rising and Falling Stock Yield Based on Copula-ACD Method

Are the Directions of Stock Price Changes Predictable? A Generalized Cross-Spectral Approach

When does the stock market listen to economic news? New evidence from copulas and news wires

Can intraday data improve the joint estimation and prediction of risk measures? Evidence from a variety of realized measures

Risk analysis of portfolio of real estate stocks: A copula approach

Expected Stock Returns and Variance Risk Premia

Can Perturbations Help Reduce Investment Risks? Risk-Aware Stock Recommendation via Split Variational Adversarial Training

Dependent Structure and Risk Analysis of S&P 500 Index's Continuously Rising Returns and Continuously Falling Returns

Dependence and Systemic Risk Analysis Between S&P 500 Index and Sector Indexes: A Conditional Value-at-Risk Approach

Stock Return Predictability and Variance Risk Premia: Statistical Inference and International Evidence

Portfolio Risk Assessment using Copula Models

Risk Analysis of Portfolio Investment in Open-end Fund Based on Multivariate Copula-GARCH and Semi-parameter Estimation

Are Stock Analysts Prophets?—A Survey of Stock Recommendations Based on Behavior Finance Theory

Are Underwriter Analysts' Recommendations Reliable?Evidence and Implications from China