Abstract:Working among vulnerable communities poses unique ethical challenges when conducting biocultural research. When communities face dire poverty and social injustice, simply observing and documenting stressors and related health outcomes may be considered exploitative by vulnerable and already overburdened residents. As biocultural researchers, our responsibility is to work toward solutions addressing differential impacts of social injustice. Here, we highlight work amongst the Comcaac, an indigenous group native to Sonora, Mexico. Today, they experience significant resource insecurity secondary to historical marginalization and structural violence. Employing ethnographic methods (participant observation, focus groups, unstructured and semi-structured interviews), we investigated social and ecological stressors likely affecting members’ health. First, we determined visible themes encompassing resource insecurity (e.g., water, food, power, medicine etc.) and struggles with poverty, racism, and associated feelings of injustice. Through deep engagement, we also discerned community members’ frustrations with what they see as exploitative research – obtaining information but failing to work actively toward solutions or remain invested in participants’ well-being. To begin addressing their most severe issues, we first documented substantial needs within the community, then obtained outside donors and organized a weekly food bank delivery of fresh foods. Now, these are distributed weekly by community leaders in culturally appropriate and locally embedded ways. Thereby, we were able to address an immediate need in a manner that will have continuing impact even while not actively conducting fieldwork. To have real meaning for our research communities, as biocultural researchers we must create ethically based long-term relationships to develop meaningful scholarship.

Considering Positionality: The Ethics of Conducting Research with Marginalized Groups

Margins as Methods, Margins as Ethics: A Feminist Framework for Studying Online Alterity

Participatory action research as a research approach: advantages, limitations and criticisms

Ethical considerations in social work research

Research Methods in the Study of Intersectionality in Psychology: Examples Informed by a Decade of Collaborative Work With Majority World Women’s Grassroots Activism

Considerations for Research Focused on Minoritized Students in School Psychology

Power, Privilege, and Precarity: Attempts to Conduct Ethical Youth Participatory Action Research as Early Career Researchers

The Merits and Pitfalls of Participatory Action Research: Navigating Tokenism and Inclusion with Lived Experience Members

Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research

Embracing Four Tensions in Human-Computer Interaction Research with Marginalized People

Ethical Futures in Art Education Research: Unlocking Interlocking Injustices in Academia

Enabling the Voices of Marginalized Groups of People in Theoretical Business Ethics Research

“With Constructivist Grounded Theory You Can’t Hide”: Social Justice Research and Critical Inquiry in the Public Sphere

In the details: the micro-ethics of negotiations and in-situ judgements in participatory design with marginalised children

Along the Margins: Marginalized Communities' Ethical Concerns about Social Platforms

Complicating Narratives: Defining and Deconstructing Ethical Challenges in Community Psychology

Ethical Considerations in Population Health Research With Vulnerable Communities and the Added Value of Community-Engaged Methodology

Feminist intersectionality: Bringing social justice to health disparities research

Inclusion of Marginalized Groups and Communities in Global Health Research Priority-Setting

Field Notes from the Border: Lessons Learned in Conducting Mental Health Research Involving Newly Arrived Latinx Immigrants as Study Participants

Co-constructing participatory ethics to address hierarchy and inequality: Social work ethics in research practice