ASHP Therapeutic Guidelines on Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/56.4.347
1999-02-15
Abstract:Despite the publication of more than 100 studies of the frequency, risk factors, and prophylaxis of stress ulcer bleeding, these subjects continue to generate controversy. Several meta-analyses pertaining to stress ulcer bleeding have been published, including one designed to resolve the discordant results of the others. Given the sheer volume of published information, it is understandable that health care providers experience frustration when confronting this topic. Stress ulcers are superficial lesions commonly (but not exclusively) involving the mucosal layer of the stomach that appear after major stressful events such as surgery and trauma. Endoscopic studies have found gastroduodenal erosions (shallow ulcers) to be common in patients who have had such stressful events, and these may lead to ulceration and bleeding.1 Microscopic bleeding associated with gastroduodenal lesions can be detected by occult blood testing (e.g., guaiac test) in patients with gastric tubes. However, other factors may influence the results of occult testing. Simply placing tubes in the upper respiratory or GI tract may injure the mucosa and result in microscopic or macroscopic (i.e., overt) bleeding. Because not all episodes of microscopic bleeding are clinically relevant, studies using only microscopic bleeding as an endpoint artificially inflate the reported frequency of GI bleeding. D Making clinical use of these inflated estimates has patient care implications and cost implications, because stress ulcer prophylaxis adds to the number of medications given and increases the risk and cost of adverse reactions.
pharmacology & pharmacy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?