Abstract:Purpose Although current research has investigated how open research data (ORD) are published, researchers' behaviour of ORD sharing on academic social networks (ASNs) remains insufficiently explored. The purpose of this study is to investigate the connections between ORDs publication and social activity to uncover data literacy gaps. Design/methodology/approach This work investigates whether the ORDs publication leads to social activity around the ORDs and their linked published articles to uncover data literacy needs. The social activity was characterised as reads and citations, over the basis of a non-invasive approach supporting this preliminary study. The eventual associations between the social activity and the researchers' profile (scientific domain, gender, region, professional position, reputation) and the quality of the ORD published were investigated to complete this picture. A random sample of ORD items extracted from ResearchGate (752 ORDs) was analysed using quantitative techniques, including descriptive statistics, logistic regression and K-means cluster analysis. Findings The results highlight three main phenomena: (1) Globally, there is still an underdeveloped social activity around self-archived ORDs in ResearchGate, in terms of reads and citations, regardless of the published ORDs quality; (2) disentangling the moderating effects over social activity around ORD spots traditional dynamics within the “innovative” practice of engaging with data practices; (3) a somewhat similar situation of ResearchGate as ASN to other data platforms and repositories, in terms of social activity around ORD, was detected. Research limitations/implications Although the data were collected within a narrow period, the random data collection ensures a representative picture of researchers' practices. Practical implications As per the implications, the study sheds light on data literacy requirements to promote social activity around ORD in the context of open science as a desirable frontier of practice. Originality/value Researchers data literacy across digital systems is still little understood. Although there are many policies and technological infrastructure providing support, the researchers do not make an in-depth use of them. Peer review The peer-review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-05-2021-0255 .

ResearchGate Score, full-text research items, and full-text reads: a follow-up study

Do ResearchGate Scores create ghost academic reputations?

Which US and European Higher Education Institutions are visible in ResearchGate and what affects their RG Score?

Anatomising the impact of ResearchGate followers and followings on influence identification

ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring Scholarship?

Ten years of research on ResearchGate, a scoping review using Google Scholar 2008_2017

Research Performance of Top Cited Indian Researchers on ResearchGate Platform: An Altmetric Analysis

Author-level metrics in the new academic profile platforms: The online behaviour of the Bibliometrics community

ResearchGate articles: Age, discipline, audience size, and impact

Association of ResearchGate research influence score with other metrics of top cited sports biomechanics scholars

Do they agree? Bibliometric evaluation vs informed peer review in the Italian research assessment exercise

The counting house: measuring those who count. Presence of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Informetrics, Webometrics and Altmetrics in the Google Scholar Citations, ResearcherID, ResearchGate, Mendeley & Twitter

R-Score: Reputation-based Scoring of Research Groups

Errors and secret data in the Italian research assessment exercise. A comment to a reply

ResearchGate and Google Scholar: how much do they differ in publications, citations and different metrics and why?

Mendeley readership as a filtering tool to identify highly cited publications

Comparison of a citation-based indicator and peer review for absolute and specific measures of research-group excellence

A critical review on altmetrics: can we measure the social impact factor?

Exploring the social activity of open research data on ResearchGate: implications for the data literacy of researchers

Ranking by Relevance and Citation Counts, a Comparative Study: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, WoS and Scopus

How does scholarly use of academic social networking sites differ by academic discipline? A case study using ResearchGate