Can we classify ampullary tumours better? Clinical, pathological and molecular features. Results of an AGEO study

Geraldine Perkins,Magali Svrcek,Cecile Bouchet-Doumenq,Thibault Voron,Orianne Colussi,Clotilde Debove,Fatiha Merabtene,Sylvie Dumont,Alain Sauvanet,Pascal Hammel,Jerome Cros,Thierry André,Jean-Baptiste Bachet,Armelle Bardier,Richard Douard,Tchao Meatchi,Frederique Peschaud,Jean-Francois Emile,Isabelle Cojean-Zelek,Pierre Laurent-Puig,Julien Taieb
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0415-8
IF: 9.075
2019-03-06
British Journal of Cancer
Abstract:<p>Ampullary adenocarcinoma (AA) originates from either intestinal (INT) or pancreaticobiliary (PB) epithelium. Different prognostic factors of recurrence have been identified in previous studies.In 91 AA patients of the AGEO retrospective multicentre cohort, we evaluated the centrally reviewed morphological classification, panel markers of Ang et al. including CK7, CK20, MUC1, MUC2 and CDX2, the 50-gene panel mutational analysis, and the clinicopathological AGEO prognostic score.Forty-three (47%) of the 91 tumours were Ang-INT, 29 (32%) were Ang-PB, 18 (20%) were ambiguous (Ang-AMB) and one could not be classified. Among these 90 tumours, 68.7% of INT tumours were Ang-INT and 78.2% of PB tumours were Ang-PB. MUC5AC expression was detected in 32.5% of the 86 evaluable cases. Among 71 tumours, <i>KRAS, TP53, APC</i> and <i>PIK3CA</i> were the most frequently mutated genes. The <i>KRAS</i> mutation was significantly more frequent in the PB subtype. In multivariate analysis, only AGEO prognostic score and tumour subtype were associated with relapse-free survival. Only AGEO prognostic score was associated with overall survival.Mutational analysis and MUC5AC expression provide no additional value in the prognostic evaluation of AA patients. Ang et al. classification and the AGEO prognostic score were confirmed as a strong prognosticator for disease recurrence.</p>
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?