Abstract:Across three studies based on a nationally representative survey (n = 1500), we developed and validated the misogyny scale. Initial items were generated from an extensive literature search and subsequently derived from validated scales assessing internalised misogyny, hostile sexism, and hostility towards women. Construct and measurement validity were established across several studies. An exploratory factor analysis (Study 1, n = 750) established the factor structure of the 10-item misogyny scale. In study 2 (n = 750), the 10-item structure was replicated via confirmatory factor analysis. The misogyny scale displayed good convergent (i.e., significant and strong relationship with male sexual entitlement, masculinity related violent beliefs and willingness to use violence) and discriminant validity (i.e., no relationship with analytical thinking). In study 3 (n = 750), we established measurement invariance across gender and age groups. This allows researchers to deploy the scale among male and female individuals, across different age groups as well as to assess latent mean differences. Significant latent mean differences for all three latent factors emerged between male and female participants, demonstrating that men had significantly stronger misogynistic attitudes than women (MDiff1 = -.482***; MDiff2 = -.324***; MDiff3 = -.197***). The latent mean differences ranged from small (Cohen’s d2 = .27; Cohen’s d3 = .19) to medium effect sizes (Cohen’s d1 = .38). The strongest latent mean differences between age groups were found for the factor ‘manipulative and exploitative nature of women’. Older age groups reported significantly stronger attitudes relating to this factor than younger participants. The misogyny scale will allow researchers to explore the psychological antecedents and consequences of misogyny among population samples and the subsequent findings may have important practical implications for prevention and intervention programs on violent (extremist) propensity development.

The Aging Men’s Masculinity Ideologies Inventory (AMMII): Dimensionality, variance composition, measurement invariance by gender, and validity.

Measurement Invariance and Comparison of Mean Scores by Age Cohort of Two Versions of the Male Role Norms Inventory

Construct validity evidence for the Male Role Norms Inventory-Short Form: A structural equation modeling approach using the bifactor model.

Measuring Individuals’ Misogynistic Attitudes: Development and Validation of the Misogyny Scale

Adolescent/Young Adult Self‐Management and Independence Self‐Report Scale: Preliminary psychometric findings

Longitudinal Trends of AMS and IIEF-5 Scores in Randomly-Selected Community Men 40 to 80 Years Old: Preliminary Results

On the Measurement of Aging Anxiety: Comparative Validity of Two Popular Measures Among Older Adults

Never-aging Stories: Western Hegemonic Masculinity Scripts

[Reliability and validity of a marital commitment scale in middle-aged and elderly couples]

The Measure of Adolescent Heterosocial Competence: Development and Initial Validation

A Latent Class Analysis of Heterosexual Young Men's Masculinities

Construction of masculinities among men aged 85 and older in the north of Sweden

Reliability and validity of the Modified Erikson Psychosocial Stage Inventory in diverse samples

Masculinity and Depression: A Longitudinal Investigation of Multidimensional Masculine Norms Among College Men

Structure and Measurement Invariance of Adult Romantic Attachment

Research in the psychology of men and masculinity using the gender role strain paradigm as a framework.

Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: reviewing three decades of research

A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Masculinity and Relationships in Men From Turkey, Norway, and the United States