Abstract:Intracellular bodies such as nucleoli, Cajal bodies and various signalling assemblies represent membraneless organelles, or condensates, that form via liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS)1,2. Biomolecular interactions—particularly homotypic interactions mediated by self-associating intrinsically disordered protein regions—are thought to underlie the thermodynamic driving forces for LLPS, forming condensates that can facilitate the assembly and processing of biochemically active complexes, such as ribosomal subunits within the nucleolus. Simplified model systems3–6 have led to the concept that a single fixed saturation concentration is a defining feature of endogenous LLPS7–9, and has been suggested as a mechanism for intracellular concentration buffering2,7,8,10. However, the assumption of a fixed saturation concentration remains largely untested within living cells, in which the richly multicomponent nature of condensates could complicate this simple picture. Here we show that heterotypic multicomponent interactions dominate endogenous LLPS, and give rise to nucleoli and other condensates that do not exhibit a fixed saturation concentration. As the concentration of individual components is varied, their partition coefficients change in a manner that can be used to determine the thermodynamic free energies that underlie LLPS. We find that heterotypic interactions among protein and RNA components stabilize various archetypal intracellular condensates—including the nucleolus, Cajal bodies, stress granules and P-bodies—implying that the composition of condensates is finely tuned by the thermodynamics of the underlying biomolecular interaction network. In the context of RNA-processing condensates such as the nucleolus, this manifests in the selective exclusion of fully assembled ribonucleoprotein complexes, providing a thermodynamic basis for vectorial ribosomal RNA flux out of the nucleolus. This methodology is conceptually straightforward and readily implemented, and can be broadly used to extract thermodynamic parameters from microscopy images. These approaches pave the way for a deeper understanding of the thermodynamics of multicomponent intracellular phase behaviour and its interplay with the nonequilibrium activity that is characteristic of endogenous condensates. Heterotypic multicomponent interactions are shown to dominate the liquid–liquid phase separation that enables the formation of intracellular condensates.

Stoichiometry controls activity of phase-separated clusters of actin signaling proteins

Lateral distribution of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate in membranes regulates formin- and ARP2/3-mediated actin nucleation

Mechanistic dissection of increased enzymatic rate in a phase-separated compartment

Liquid-like condensates mediate competition between actin branching and bundling

Assembly of model postsynaptic densities involves interactions auxiliary to stoichiometric binding

Kinetic trapping organizes actin filaments within liquid-like protein droplets

Myosin 1D and the branched actin network control the condensation of p62 bodies

Liquid-like condensates that bind actin drive filament polymerization and bundling

Micropolarity governs the structural organization of biomolecular condensates

A lipid bound actin meshwork organizes liquid phase separation in model membranes

Phase Separation Can Increase Enzyme Activity by Concentration and Molecular Organization

Binding and dimerization control phase separation in a compartment

Interfacial exchange dynamics of biomolecular condensates are highly sensitive to client interactions

Lipid Surfaces and Glutamate Anions Enhance Formation of Dynamic Biomolecular Condensates Containing Bacterial Cell Division Protein FtsZ and Its DNA-Bound Regulator SlmA

Phase Transitions in the Assembly of Multivalent Signalling Proteins.

Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry

Composition-dependent thermodynamics of intracellular phase separation

Transmembrane coupling accelerates the growth of liquid-like protein condensates

Controlling biomolecular condensates via chemical reactions

Linking modulation of bio-molecular phase behaviour with collective interactions

Protein condensates in the the secretory pathway: Unraveling biophysical interactions and function