Abstract:In this study, the three CCS + MBP showed the best biomechanical stability compared with the other five internal fixation models. The biomechanical stability of DHS + DS was second only to that of the three CCS + MBP, and both could be considered as a treatment for Pauwels III femoral neck fracture based on biomechanical stability alone. However, after considering the biomechanical stability, the stability of the internal fixation model, the difficulty of surgery and surgical trauma, FNS showed some advantages, so we believe that FNS can be considered as an effective method for treating Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture. CCS, cannulated compression screw; DHS, dynamic hip screw; DS, DHS with de‐rotational screw; FNS, femoral neck system; MBP, CCS with medial buttress plate; PFNA, proximal femoral nail anti‐rotation. Objective The current investigation sought to utilize finite element analysis to replicate the biomechanical effects of different fixation methods, with the objective of establishing a theoretical framework for the optimal choice of modalities in managing Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures. Methods The Pauwels type III fracture configuration, characterized by angles of 70°, was simulated in conjunction with six distinct internal fixation methods, including cannulated compression screw (CCS), dynamic hip screw (DHS), DHS with de‐rotational screw (DS), CCS with medial buttress plate (MBP), proximal femoral nail anti‐rotation (PFNA), and femoral neck system (FNS). These models were developed and refined using Geomagic and SolidWorks software. Subsequently, finite element analysis was conducted utilizing Ansys software, incorporating axial loading, torsional loading, yield loading and cyclic loading. Results Under axial loading conditions, the peak stress values for internal fixation and the femur were found to be highest for CCS (454.4; 215.4 MPa) and CCS + MBP (797.2; 284.2 MPa), respectively. The corresponding maximum and minimum displacements for internal fixation were recorded as 6.65 mm for CCS and 6.44 mm for CCS + MBP. When subjected to torsional loading, the peak stress values for internal fixation were highest for CCS + MBP (153.6 MPa) and DHS + DS (72.8 MPa), while for the femur, the maximum and minimum peak stress values were observed for CCS + MBP (119.3 MPa) and FNS (17.6 MPa), respectively. Furthermore, the maximum and minimum displacements for internal fixation were measured as 0.249 mm for CCS + MBP and 0.205 mm for PFNA. Additionally, all six internal fixation models showed excellent performance in terms of yield load and fatigue life. Conclusion CCS + MBP had the best initial mechanical stability in treatment for Pauwels type III fracture. However, the MBP was found to be more susceptible to shear stress, potentially increasing the risk of plate breakage. Furthermore, the DHS + DS exhibited superior biomechanical stability compared to CCS, DHS, and PFNA, thereby offering a more conducive environment for fracture healing. Additionally, it appeared that FNS represented a promising treatment strategy, warranting further validation in future studies.

Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture—a finite element analysis

Comparison of femoral mechanics before and after internal fixation removal and the effect of sclerosis on femoral stress: a finite element analysis

[Study on biomechanical stability in simulated femoral neck fracture fixation by two cannulated screws].

Prevention of Sclerosis Around Cannulated Screw after Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures with Bioceramic Nails: a Finite Element Analysis

Biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis

Evaluating three internal fixation techniques for Pauwels III femoral neck fractures via finite element analysis

Biomechanical Study of Two Alternative Methods for the Treatment of Vertical Femoral Neck Fractures – A Finite Element Analysis

Comparison of three different internal fixation methods in the treatment of femoral neck fracture

Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Internal Fixation Methods Based on Finite Element Analysis for Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fracture

Biomechanical properties of four internal fixations for femoral neck fracture: a finite element comparison

Biomechanical Effects of Internal Fixation with Self-Lock Compression Anti-Rotation Blade for Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fractures: a Comparative Finite Element Analysis

Biomechanical analysis of a new cannulated screw for unstable femoral neck fractures

Finite Element Analysis of Six Internal Fixations in the Treatment of Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fracture

Internal fixation system with the pyramid screw head for the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures

Biomechanical Study of Three Cannulated Screws Configurations for Femur Neck Fracture: A Finite Element Analysis

Comparison of Femoral Neck System to Multiple Cancellous Screws and Dynamic Hip Screws in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures

Comparison of dynamic hip screw with anti-rotation screw and femoral neck system internal fixation for the treatment of garden II–IV type femoral neck fractures

Biomechanical Evaluation of a New Device for Internal Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures

Biomechanical Evaluation of Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation Based on Finite Element Analysis

Comparison of physical parameters of two internal fixation devices for femoral neck fractures

Comparison of young femoral neck fractures treated by femoral neck system, multiple cancellous screws and dynamic hip screws: a retrospectively comparison study