Higher serum uric acid as a risk factor for frailty in older adults: A nationwide population‐based study
Min‐gu Kang,Ji Yeon Baek,Yunju Jo,Dongryeol Ryu,Il‐Young Jang,Hee‐Won Jung,Beom‐Jun Kim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.13561
2024-08-20
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle
Abstract:Background Uric acid (UA), the terminal breakdown product of purine metabolism, possesses contradictory roles, functioning both as an inflammatory mediator and as an antioxidant. Its clinical relevance, particularly in geriatric populations, remains a topic of ongoing debate. Aiming to elucidate whether circulating UA is detrimental or beneficial to human health, we investigate the association between serum UA concentrations and the frailty index—a comprehensive measure of biological aging in a nationally representative cohort of community‐dwelling older adults. Methods We conducted a population‐based, cross‐sectional study utilizing data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The sample included 4268 participants aged 65 years and above. A deficit accumulation frailty index (FI) was constructed using 38 items that assess physical, cognitive, psychological, and social domains. Based on the FI, participants were categorized into non‐frail (FI ≤ 0.15), pre‐frail (0.15 0.25). Serum UA levels were quantified through a colorimetric enzymatic assay. Results After controlling for confounders such as age, sex, socioeconomic status (including income and education level), lifestyle factors (smoking status), and medical history (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, stroke, cardiovascular diseases), and body mass index, serum UA levels were observed to be significantly higher in frail participants compared with their non‐frail counterparts (P
medicine, general & internal,geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology