Abstract:Background: Although current recommendations suggest that hip hemiarthroplasties performed for femoral neck fractures be implanted with bone cement, it is known to cause cardiorespiratory and hemodynamic reactions that in some patients can be fatal. Older patients may be at particular risk of this complication, but because of its relative infrequency, large studies-perhaps even larger than can be achieved in the context of single-country national registries-are needed to get reasonably precise estimates as to its frequency. Pooling results from national registries reporting on death within 48 hours of cement exposure in this setting may therefore be helpful. Question/purpose: In a systematic review of studies based on large national registries, we asked: Does the risk of death within 48 hours of hip hemiarthroplasty differ between patients treated with cemented and cementless implants? Methods: MEDLINE and Embase data sources were searched for cohort studies on patients with hip fractures treated with cement or cementless hip hemiprostheses based on results from national registries that tracked perioperative deaths within 48 hours of surgery, from 2010 or later (to include only studies that used contemporary cement techniques). We excluded registry research on elective THAs for other indications (such as degenerative joint disease), mixed populations (registries that combined patients having arthroplasty for fracture and for other diagnoses like osteoarthritis, such that we could not separate them), and overlapping data from the same registers (to avoid double and triple publications of similar data). Five studies met our inclusion criteria. The cohorts ranged from about 11,000 to about 25,000 patients. About 31% of the patients were in the cementless group. Two studies reported the age ranges of participating patients, and three studies communicated mean ages (which were 82 years for both sexes). Twice as many females as males were present in both the cemented and cementless group. When reported, more than 50% in both groups were in the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification 3 or 4. Study quality was deemed good according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and the Egger test, and study heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 heterogeneity statistic and Cochran Q heterogeneity test. There was some heterogeneity between the studies, with a Cochran Q statistics of 8.13 (degrees of freedom = 4; p = 0.08) and an I2 statistic of 50.8%. There was evidence for a small amount of publication bias (Egger test; p = 0.02). The pooled risk ratio (RR) from a random-effects model is presented with 95% confidence intervals. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of any fatalities within 48 hours of hip fracture treatment with cementless compared with cemented prostheses. We performed a sensitivity analysis to assess the needed association of a potential unmeasured or uncontrolled confounding, and we made an estimate of the amount of unmeasured confounding that would need to be present in order to change the direction of the result. We summarized this using a parameter known as the "E-value." Based on that sensitivity analysis, we found it unlikely that an unmeasured hypothetical confounder could explain the significant association between cemented and cementless implants and risk of death within 48 hours of hip hemiarthroplasty. Results: Compared with the cementless group, mortality was increased in the cemented group (RR 1.63 [95% CI 1.31 to 2.02]; p < 0.001). The number needed to harm from the pooled data was 1 of 183 operated patients; that is, for every 183 patients treated with cemented implants, one death would be expected. Conclusion: Bone cement is associated with a higher risk of fatalities within 48 hours of surgery compared with cementless prostheses. However, numerous prior studies have found a higher risk of serious complications resulting in additional surgical procedures associated with cementless devices in this population; those complications, as well, may result in death. Based on our study alone, we cannot recommend cementless implants in this setting. Large, national registries should evaluate fixation choice in older patients with hip fractures, and those studies should consider both early death and the potential for later harms. Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.

Anaesthesia type and cement reactions in hip fracture surgery

The Effect of Anesthetic Regimen on Bone Cement Implantation Syndrome in Cemented Hemiarthroplasty for Hip Fracture

Bone cement implantation syndrome in hip arthroplasty: Frequency, severity and prevention

What is the risk of death or severe harm due to bone cement implantation syndrome among patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of femur? A patient safety surveillance study

The effect of intravertebral anesthesia on bone cement implantation syndrome in aged patients: A single-center 5-year retrospective study

Efficacy of Antibiotic-Impregnated Cement in Total Hip Replacement

Improved outcomes for spinal versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a retrospective cohort study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

Shall We Not Pressurise It? Effects of Bone Cement Pressurisation on Mortality and Revision Following Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Neck of Femur Fracture Patients: A Comparative Cohort Study

Effect of anaesthesia on cemented hemiarthroplasty -A multicentre retrospective study (TRON study)

Impact of spinal Anaesthesia versus general Anaesthesia on the incidence of surgical site infections after knee or hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

Study of the cement implantation syndrome: A review

Comparison of Risk of Complication Between Neuraxial Anaesthesia and General Anaesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Periprosthetic joint infections in femoral neck fracture patients treated with hemiarthroplasty – should we use antibiotic-loaded bone cement?

Morbidity and Mortality Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty With Spinal Versus General Anesthesia: A Retrospective Analysis

Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision in the Setting of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Resulting in Bone Cement Implantation Syndrome (BCIS), Pulseless Electrical Activity (PEA) Arrest, and Intraoperative Death: A Case Report and Literature Review

Does the Risk of Death Within 48 Hours of Hip Hemiarthroplasty Differ Between Patients Treated with Cemented and Cementless Implants? A Meta-analysis of Large, National Registries

[Total hip endoprostheses--characteristic aspects from the anesthesiologic viewpoint]

Anesthesia Technique and Mortality after Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective, Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study

Impact of spinal versus general anaesthesia on perioperative obstructive sleep apnoea severity in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty: a post hoc analysis of two randomised controlled trials

Fluoroscopy comes to the rescue in anaesthesia management of a case of ankylosing spondylitis

Effect of Different Anesthetic Methods on Postoperative Outcomes in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery