Abstract:Consider two treatments and a combination of them. Given n available experimental units, the problem is to determine the number of units n, to be assigned to the first treatment, n 2 to the second, and n, to the combination, n = Σ i , n i , n i ≥ 0, i = 1, 2, 3, subject to suitable optimality criteria. This study was motivated by an example of a weighing design with n = 18. n 1 = 2. n 2 = 9, n s = 7 given by Box and Tiao [2, Section 2.7.3]. The allocation seemed far from optimal leading to the present investigation. Four models are developed for two non-interactive treatments and the combination of them. They may be described as 1. A weighing model, 2. A sum of independent random variables model, 3. A mixtures model, and 4. A factorial model. Three optimality criteria are considered: 1. D-optimality, 2. A-optimality and 3. minimization of the variance of the difference of estimators of the two treatment means. It is shown for all criteria for Models 2, 3, 4 and for Criterion 3 for Model I that n s = 0, n 1 = n 2 = n/2 if n is even, n 1 = (n + 1)/2. n 2 = (n – 1)/2 if n is odd. But rather different optimal designs are obtained for Criteria 1 and 2 and Model I, different for the two criteria and different also from the design of the Box-Tiao example. The results presented here are of interest for two reasons. They have intrinsic interest showing that the choice of model and optimality criterion may lead to an intuitively unexpected design in a simple experimental situation. They have instructional interest providing elementary illustrations of modern design concepts that may be used as class examples or problems for solution.

Optimal exact designs of experiments via Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programming

Solving the Optimal Experiment Design Problem with Mixed-Integer Convex Methods

Optimal Designs For Two Non-Interactive Treatment

PNOD: An Efficient Projected Newton Framework for Exact Optimal Experimental Designs

Design of Complex Experiments Using Mixed Integer Linear Programming

The polytope of optimal approximate designs: extending the selection of informative experiments

Using particle swarm optimization to search for locally $D$-optimal designs for mixed factor experiments with binary response

Optimal design for linear models via gradient flow

Nonlinear Bayesian optimal experimental design using logarithmic Sobolev inequalities

Optimal experimental design: Formulations and computations

Optimal orthogonal designs for experiments with four-level and two-level factors

D-optimal Designs for Multinomial Logistic Models

Mixed-level designs with orthogonality and relatively optimal run order

G-optimal designs for hierarchical linear models: an equivalence theorem and a nature-inspired meta-heuristic algorithm

Hybrid algorithms for generating optimal designs for discriminating multiple nonlinear models under various error distributional assumptions

ForLion: a new algorithm for D-optimal designs under general parametric statistical models with mixed factors

Optimal experimental designs for treatment contrasts in heteroscedastic models with covariates

Computing Optimal Designs of multiresponse Experiments reduces to Second-Order Cone Programming

R-optimal designs for multi-response regression models with multi-factors

D ‐optimal designs for multi‐response linear models with two groups

Construction of 2fi-optimal row-column designs