Abstract:Open research practices seek to enhance the transparency and reproducibility of research. While there is evidence of increased uptake in these practices, such as study preregistration and open data, facilitated by new infrastructure and policies, little research has assessed general uptake of such practices across psychology university researchers. The current study estimates psychologists' level of engagement in open research practices across universities in the United Kingdom and Ireland, while also assessing possible explanatory factors that may impact their engagement. Data were collected from 602 psychology researchers in the United Kingdom and Ireland on the extent to which they have implemented various practices (e.g., use of preprints, preregistration, open data, open materials). Here we present the summarized descriptive results, as well as considering differences between various categories of researcher (e.g., career stage, subdiscipline, methodology), and examining the relationship between researcher's practices and their self‐reported capability, opportunity, and motivation (COM‐B) to engage in open research practices. Results show that while there is considerable variability in engagement of open research practices, differences across career stage and subdiscipline of psychology are small by comparison. We observed consistent differences according to respondent's research methodology and based on the presence of institutional support for open research. COM‐B dimensions were collectively significant predictors of engagement in open research, with automatic motivation emerging as a consistently strong predictor. We discuss these findings, outline some of the challenges experienced in this study, and offer suggestions and recommendations for future research. Estimating the prevalence of responsible research practices is important to assess sustained behaviour change in research reform, tailor educational training initiatives, and to understand potential factors that might impact engagement.

Leveraging the Open Science Framework in clinical psychological assessment research.

Open access of psychological intervention manuals

Demystifying Open Science in health psychology and behavioral medicine: a practical guide to Registered Reports and Data Notes

Transparency and reproducibility in the journal of contextual behavioral science: An audit study

Hits and misses in the last decade of open science: Researchers from different subfields and career stages offer personal reflections and suggestions

Special Editorial: Open science and the Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry - next steps?

Can psychology walk the walk of open science?

Illustrating the value of social work: results of an open pilot trial of the psychosocial acuity scale in a large urban pediatric hospital

Open Accessibility in Education Research: Enhancing the Credibility, Equity, Impact, and Efficiency of Research

Implementation and assessment of an end-to-end Open Science & Data Collaborations program

From old school to open science: The implications of new research norms for educational psychology and beyond

Is Openness to Using Empirically Supported Treatments Related to Organizational Culture and Climate?

Exploring Freely Available Data Tools to Support Open Data and Open Science

Implications of the open science era for educational psychology research syntheses

Open Science in Education Sciences

A registered report survey of open research practices in psychology departments in the UK and Ireland

The Psychological Science Accelerator: Advancing Psychology through a Distributed Collaborative Network

Challenges and ways forward in bridging units of analysis in clinical psychological science.

Optimising the use of electronic medical records for large scale research in psychiatry

A framework for language technologies in behavioral research and clinical applications: Ethical challenges, implications, and solutions.