Abstract:[Purpose] This study examines the impact of executives’ financial expertise on the funding level of defined benefit pension plans. On one hand, if executives with high financial expertise prefer to utilize available cash for more efficient investment options rather than locking it up in pension contributions, a negative relationship is expected. On the other hand, if executives with high financial expertise aim to increase the current funding level to alleviate future cash constraints or are concerned about negative evaluations in the capital market, a positive relationship is expected. The empirical analysis seeks to determine whether executives’ financial expertise lowers or raises the pension funding level. [Methodology] The sample for analysis consists of companies listed on the KOSPI and KOSDAQ from 2012 to 2022 that have adopted a defined benefit pension plan. Although the pension system was implemented in 2005, the initial period is excluded due to the low adoption rate of pension plans and the low funding ratio of defined benefit assets at the beginning of the system’s implementation. Executives’ financial expertise is measured by executives with keywords in their past careers such as finance, accounting, treasury, or CFO, and the pension funding level is measured by the ratio of pension assets to pension liabilities. [Findings] The empirical analysis shows that the higher the proportion of executives with financial expertise, the lower the pension funding level. This result can be interpreted as companies with executives having high financial expertise maintaining a lower funding level due to the high opportunity cost of investing available cash in pension contributions. Additionally, we find that the negative relationship between executives’ financial expertise and the pension funding level is driven by the subsample with a high funding level. [Implications] The results of this study provide evidence that for the pension system to act as a means of securing workers’ retirement income, an improvement in the return on pension assets is necessary.

Pension Fund Board Governance and Asset Allocation: Evidence from Switzerland

Board Gender Diversity and Cost of Equity: Evidence from Mandatory Female Board Representation

National Culture and Governance on Bondholder Wealth: Evidence from Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances Around the World

Cash holdings in pension funds

Political Representation and Governance: Evidence from the Investment Decisions of Public Pension Funds

Governance, Legitimacy, and Decision-Making Capability of the Chinese National Social Security Fund-Against the Backdrop of International Comparison

Augmented wealth in Switzerland: the influence of pension wealth on wealth inequality

Corporate Governance and Cash Holdings: Evidence from Worldwide Board Reforms

Capitalizing on Diversity: The Impact of Board Gender Diversity on the Value of Excess Cash

Annuity puzzle: Evidence from a Swiss pension fund

How does board gender diversity drive the ESG performance‐cash holdings relationship? Evidence from China

Corporate Cash Reserves and Corporate Governance Mechanism: the Empirical Study of the Chinese Publicly Traded Corporations

Board Composition and Cash Hoarding: Evidence from Jordanian Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises

Financial Expertise of Corporate Executives and Pension Funding Level

Board Diversity, Firm Risk, and Corporate Policies

Globalization Trend of Pension Fund Investment: Across Selected OECD Countries

Boardroom gender diversity and risk-taking in the insurance industry: do organizational form and ownership structure matter?

The Moderating Role of Treasury Bills and Bonds Allocations on the Relationship between Systematic Risk and Investment Portfolio Performance of Pension Schemes in Kenya

Sovereign Portfolio Composition and Bank Risk

Financial Literacy and Retirement Planning in Switzerland

Board expertise diversity and firm performance in sub-Saharan Africa: do firm age and size matter?