Comparative Risk of Cardiovascular Events With Biologic and Synthetic Disease‐Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Siddharth Singh,Mathurin Fumery,Abha G. Singh,Namrata Singh,Larry J. Prokop,Parambir S. Dulai,William J. Sandborn,Jeffrey R. Curtis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23875
2020-03-27
Abstract:<p>We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the comparative effects of tumor necrosis factor‐α inhibitors (TNFi), non‐TNFi biologic and conventional synthetic disease‐modifying anti‐rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) on cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Through a systematic search through May 8, 2018, we included 14 observational studies in adults with RA treated with TNFi, non‐TNFi biologics, tofacitinib or csDMARDs, reporting the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or stroke. Only studies reporting active comparators were included. We performed random effects meta‐analysis and estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).As compared to TNFi, tocilizumab was associated with a decreased risk of MACE (OR, 0.59 [0.34‐1.00]), whereas csDMARDs were associated with increased risk of MACE (csDMARDs, including methotrexate: OR, 1.45 [1.09‐1.93]; without methotrexate: OR, 2.57 [1.32‐5.00]), without heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup>=0%); there was no difference in risk of MACE between abatacept and TNFi (OR, 0.89 [0.71‐1.11]), or between tocilizumab and abatacept (OR, 0.81 [0.57‐1.16]). Based on 11 cohorts (n=135,053 patients), as compared to TNFi, csDMARDs were associated with increased risk of stroke (OR, 1.17 [1.01‐1.36]); there was no difference in risk of stroke between different biologics (tocilizumab vs. TNFi: OR, 0.98 [0.59‐1.61]; abatacept vs. TNFi: OR, 1.08 [0.86‐1.34]; tocilizumab vs. abatacept: OR, 0.73 [0.39‐1.38]), without heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup>=0%). No comparative studies on cardiovascular risk with tofacitinib were identified. Based on meta‐analysis, as compared to TNFi, tocilizumab may be associated with reduced risk of MACE, whereas csDMARDs may be associated with increased risk of MACE and stroke.</p>
rheumatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?