Scaffolds for the repair of bone defects in clinical studies: a systematic review
Jian-Hua Zeng,Shi-Wei Liu,Long Xiong,Peng Qiu,Ling-Hua Ding,Shi-Lang Xiong,Jing-Tang Li,Xin-Gen Liao,Zhi-Ming Tang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0724-2
IF: 2.6
2018-02-12
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Abstract:BackgroundThis systematic review aims to summarize the clinical studies on the use of scaffolds in the repair of bony defects.MethodsThe relevant articles were searched through PubMed database. The following keywords and search terms were used: “scaffolds,” “patient,” “clinic,” “bone repair,” “bone regeneration,” “repairing bone defect,” “repair of bone,” “osteanagenesis,” “osteanaphysis,” and “osteoanagenesis.” The articles were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, performed by two reviewers.ResultsA total of 373 articles were obtained using PubMed database. After screening, 20 articles were identified as relevant for the purpose of this systematic review. We collected the data of biological scaffolds and synthetic scaffolds. There are eight clinical studies of biological scaffolds included collagen, gelatin, and cellular scaffolds for bone healing. In addition, 12 clinical studies of synthetic scaffolds on HAp, TCP, bonelike, and their complex scaffolds for repairing bone defects were involved in this systematic review.ConclusionsThere are a lot of clinical evidences showed that application of scaffolds had a good ability to facilitate bone repair and osteogenesis. However, the ideal and reliable guidelines are insufficiently applied and the number and quality of studies in this field remain to be improved.
orthopedics