Abstract:Extensive literature probes labor market discrimination through correspondence studies in which researchers send pairs of resumes to employers, which are closely matched except for social signals such as gender or ethnicity. Upon perceiving these signals, individuals quickly activate associated stereotypes. The Stereotype Content Model (SCM; Fiske 2002) categorizes these stereotypes into two dimensions: warmth and competence. Our research integrates findings from correspondence studies with theories of social psychology, asking: Can discrimination between social groups, measured through employer callback disparities, be predicted by warmth and competence perceptions of social signals? We collect callback rates from 21 published correspondence studies, varying for 592 social signals. On those social signals, we collected warmth and competence perceptions from an independent group of online raters. We found that social perception predicts callback disparities for studies varying race and gender, which are indirectly signaled by names on these resumes. Yet, for studies adjusting other categories like sexuality and disability, the influence of social perception on callbacks is inconsistent. For instance, a more favorable perception of signals like parenthood does not consistently lead to increased callbacks, underscoring the necessity for further research. Our research offers pivotal strategies to address labor market discrimination in practice. Leveraging the warmth and competence framework allows for the predictive identification of bias against specific groups without extensive correspondence studies. By distilling hiring discrimination into these two dimensions, we not only facilitate the development of decision support systems for hiring managers but also equip computer scientists with a foundational framework for debiasing Large Language Models and other methods that are increasingly employed in hiring processes.

Age discrimination in hiring decisions: Evidence from a field experiment in the labor market

Age Discrimination in Hiring Decisions: A Factorial Survey among Managers in Nine European Countries

Does Ageist Language in Job Ads Predict Age Discrimination in Hiring?

Ageism on LinkedIn: Discrimination towards older applicants during LinkedIn screening

Research on Age Discrimination against Job Seekers Based on Recruitment Advertisements

Gender Discrimination in Hiring: Evidence from a Cross-National Harmonized Field Experiment

The hiring of older workers: evidence from Germany

Age and hiring for high school graduate Hispanics in the United States

Age-based hiring discrimination as a function of equity norms and self-perceived objectivity

Mitigating Age Biases in Resume Screening AI Models

Gender Bias in Academic Recruitment? Evidence from a Survey Experiment in the Nordic Region

Can Information About Negative Age-Related Stereotypes Improve the Employment Chances of Older Unemployed Workers?

Perceived warmth and competence predict callback rates in meta-analyzed North American labor market experiments

Hard and soft age discrimination: the dual nature of workplace discrimination

Discrimination in Organizations on the Basis of Age

Workplace Age Discrimination and Social-psychological Well-being

Gender discrimination and the backlash effect in recruitment and dismissal processes: experimental evidence from Slovakia

Can Specialized Attention from HR Backfire? the Role of Older Workers’ HR Practices on Retention

Age and Reemployment Success After Job Loss

Examining potential gender bias in automated-job alerts in the Spanish market

Audits as Evidence: Experiments, Ensembles, and Enforcement