Abstract:Heterogeneous catalysts are rather complex materials that come in many classes (e.g., metals, oxides, carbides) and shapes. At the same time, the interaction of the catalyst surface with even a relatively simple gas-phase environment such as syngas (CO and H2) may already produce a wide variety of reaction intermediates ranging from atoms to complex molecules. The starting point for creating predictive maps of, e.g., surface coverages or chemical activities of potential catalyst materials is the reliable prediction of adsorption enthalpies of all of these intermediates. For simple systems, direct density functional theory (DFT) calculations are currently the method of choice. However, a wider exploration of complex materials and reaction networks generally requires enthalpy predictions at lower computational cost.The use of machine learning (ML) and related techniques to make accurate and low-cost predictions of quantum-mechanical calculations has gained increasing attention lately. The employed approaches span from physically motivated models over hybrid physics-ΔML approaches to complete black-box methods such as deep neural networks. In recent works we have explored the possibilities for using a compressed sensing method (Sure Independence Screening and Sparsifying Operator, SISSO) to identify sparse (low-dimensional) descriptors for the prediction of adsorption enthalpies at various active-site motifs of metals and oxides. We start from a set of physically motivated primary features such as atomic acid/base properties, coordination numbers, or band moments and let the data and the compressed sensing method find the best algebraic combination of these features. Here we take this work as a starting point to categorize and compare recent ML-based approaches with a particular focus on model sparsity, data efficiency, and the level of physical insight that one can obtain from the model.Looking ahead, while many works to date have focused only on the mere prediction of databases of, e.g., adsorption enthalpies, there is also an emerging interest in our field to start using ML predictions to answer fundamental science questions about the functioning of heterogeneous catalysts or perhaps even to design better catalysts than we know today. This task is significantly simplified in works that make use of scaling-relation-based models (volcano curves), where the model outcome is determined by only one or two adsorption enthalpies and which consequently become the sole target for ML-based high-throughput screening or design. However, the availability of cheap ML energetics also allows going beyond scaling relations. On the basis of our own work in this direction, we will discuss the additional physical insight that can be achieved by integrating ML-based predictions with traditional catalysis modeling techniques from thermal and electrocatalysis, such as the computational hydrogen electrode and microkinetic modeling, as well as the challenges that lie ahead.

Predicting Chemical Reaction Barriers with a Machine Learning Model

The importance of reaction energy in predicting chemical reaction barriers with machine learning models

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Activation Energies for Chemical Reactions on Metal Surfaces

Machine learning models predict calculation outcomes with the transferability necessary for computational catalysis

Predicting outcomes of catalytic reactions using machine learning

Perspective on Computational Reaction Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods in Heterogeneous Catalysis.

Estimating Free Energy Barriers for Heterogeneous Catalytic Reactions with Machine Learning Potentials and Umbrella Integration

Predicting binding motifs of complex adsorbates using machine learning with a physics-inspired graph representation

Machine-Learning-Augmented Chemisorption Model for CO2 Electroreduction Catalyst Screening.

Towards the design of chemical reactions: Machine learning barriers of competing mechanisms in reactant space

Adsorption Enthalpies for Catalysis Modeling through Machine-Learned Descriptors

Prediction of energies for reaction intermediates and transition states on catalyst surfaces using graph-based machine learning models

Interpretable Machine Learning Models for Practical Antimonate Electrocatalyst Performance

Using machine learning to go beyond potential energy surface benchmarking for chemical reactivity

Data-efficient modeling of catalytic reactions via enhanced sampling and on-the-fly learning of machine learning potentials

Accurate Energy Barriers for Catalytic Reaction Pathways: An Automatic Training Protocol for Machine Learning Force Fields

Accurate prediction of binding energies for two‐dimensional catalytic materials using machine learning

Exploring catalytic reaction networks with machine learning

Toward Next-Generation Heterogeneous Catalysts: Empowering Surface Reactivity Prediction with Machine Learning

Prediction of Organic Reaction Outcomes Using Machine Learning

A Machine Learning Based Approach to Reaction Rate Estimation