Comparison of the Pathway to the Inner Ear Between Postauricular and Intramuscular Injection of Dexamethasone in Guinea Pigs

Aiping Chen,Wenwen Liu,Lei Xu,Zhiqiang Hou,Zhaomin Fan,Haibo Wang,Mingming Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.811626
IF: 3.4
2022-03-04
Frontiers in Neurology
Abstract:Background Postauricular injection as a local therapy has been confirmed to be effective for inner ear diseases. However, the mechanism for the drugs entering the inner ears remains unknown. This study aims to compare the distribution of dexamethasone by intramuscular injection with that by postauricular injection, and explore the pathway of the drugs entering the inner ears. Methods An in vivo optical imaging system was used to conduct a time course observation to compare the distribution of dexamethasone by intramuscular injection with that by postauricular injection in male guinea pigs. The drug availability in the tympanic mucosa, tympanum, endolymphatic sac, and cochlea was observed by a confocal laser scanning microscope. Results The local fluorescent intensity by postauricular injection was significantly higher in the inner ears, and lower in partial peripheral organs, than that by the intramuscular injection. The drug metabolism by postauricular injection exhibited an obviously sustained release effect in the inner ears. Drugs by postauricular injection might enter the endolymphatic sac through the posterior auricular artery and occipital artery, as well as the connections of the mastoid emissary vein, sigmoid sinus and endolymphatic sac. Conclusion More drugs concentrated in the inner ear for longer therapeutic time and less systemic delivery implied more effective and less risk of side effects through postauricular injection than intramuscular injection safer for the treatment of inner ear diseases.
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?