Loss, Motherhood and the Queer ‘Happy Ending’

Sashi Nair
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20512856.2019.1595476
2019-01-02
Journal of Language, Literature and Culture
Abstract:Throughout the twentieth century, and particularly prior to Stonewall, literature frequently represented same-sex desire in direct opposition to the forward-looking heterosexual romance narratives that ended with marriage and implied or literal procreation. When Patricia Highsmith published <i>The Price of Salt</i>, in 1952, its popularity with readers, and in particular queer readers, was attributed by the author herself to the probable happy ending of its same-sex romance narrative. This happy ending, however, is uncoupled from the idea of a 'happily ever after', because instead of romance gesturing towards the promise of children, it is the precursor for a (queer) mother's loss of her child. This paper will argue that the introduction of children into a narrative almost always means that same-sex desire will not be allowed to flourish, even in a text that interrogates heteronormative assumptions, like Virginia Woolf's <i>Mrs. Dalloway</i>. <i>The Price of Salt</i> is significant, then, not because it provides a happily ever after for a same-sex couple, but because it calls into question the very notion that a happy ending is a gesture to a happy future.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?