Human enhancement: from disability to superability

Bernard Dan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14215

2019-04-04

Abstract:Video Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GY9YmA2jkow&t=1s

pediatrics,clinical neurology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The end of spasticity?

Bernard Dan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13496

2017-08-18

Abstract:Video Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bC7NYmojsd4&t=4s

pediatrics,clinical neurology
Second Thoughts on Enhancement and Disability

Melinda C. Hall

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190622879.013.34

2019-03-14

Abstract:Transhumanist arguments in support of radical human enhancement are inimical to disability justice projects. Transhumanist thinkers, the strongest promoters of human enhancement, and fellow travelers who claim enhancement is a moral obligation, make arguments that rely on the denigration of disabled embodiment and lives. These arguments link disability with risk. The promotion of human enhancement is therefore open to significant disability critique despite transhumanism’s claims to allyship with disability justice activism. This chapter lays out such a disability critique of enhancement and further supports its claims by describing bioethics, and therefore transhumanism, as biopolitical in the sense Michel Foucault uses the term. Finally, this chapter develops an alternative vision of enhancement. This alternative vision poses a disability-inclusive future, accepts the risks of embodiment, and lays groundwork for a counterdiscourse of enhancement.
Emerging Medical Technologies and Their Use in Bionic Repair and Human Augmentation

Albert Manero,Viviana Rivera,Qiushi Fu,Jonathan D. Schwartzman,Hannah Prock-Gibbs,Neel Shah,Deep Gandhi,Evan White,Kaitlyn E. Crawford,Melanie J. Coathup

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11070695

IF: 5.046

2024-07-09

Bioengineering

Abstract:As both the proportion of older people and the length of life increases globally, a rise in age-related degenerative diseases, disability, and prolonged dependency is projected. However, more sophisticated biomedical materials, as well as an improved understanding of human disease, is forecast to revolutionize the diagnosis and treatment of conditions ranging from osteoarthritis to Alzheimer’s disease as well as impact disease prevention. Another, albeit quieter, revolution is also taking place within society: human augmentation. In this context, humans seek to improve themselves, metamorphosing through self-discipline or more recently, through use of emerging medical technologies, with the goal of transcending aging and mortality. In this review, and in the pursuit of improved medical care following aging, disease, disability, or injury, we first highlight cutting-edge and emerging materials-based neuroprosthetic technologies designed to restore limb or organ function. We highlight the potential for these technologies to be utilized to augment human performance beyond the range of natural performance. We discuss and explore the growing social movement of human augmentation and the idea that it is possible and desirable to use emerging technologies to push the boundaries of what it means to be a healthy human into the realm of superhuman performance and intelligence. This potential future capability is contrasted with limitations in the right-to-repair legislation, which may create challenges for patients. Now is the time for continued discussion of the ethical strategies for research, implementation, and long-term device sustainability or repair.
Revolutionizing Human Augmentation: The Future of Neuroprosthetics and Brain-Computer Interface Technologies

Buse Liv

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62802/ctht0m34

2024-08-01

Abstract:The future of neuroprosthesis and brain-computer interface (BCI) technologies is poised to transform medical treatments, cognitive development, and human-machine interaction. Neuroprosthetics, which integrate artificial devices with the nervous system to restore or enhance sensory and motor functions, have already improved the lives of people with disabilities. Advances in materials science and neural interfacing are taking these technologies even further, enabling more seamless integration and better control of prosthetic limbs and sensory devices. As these technologies improve, they may soon be able to restore complex functions such as speech, vision, and memory. At the same time, BCIs go beyond traditional applications for neurological disorders, opening up possibilities for cognitive enhancement, neural data transfer, and immersive virtual experiences. With advances in machine learning and neuroimaging, BCIs can enhance cognitive abilities, treat neurological diseases, and redefine human-computer interaction. However, these technologies also raise ethical, social, and security concerns. The risk of misuse, such as unauthorized access to neural data, and the potential creation of cognitive hierarchies emphasize the need for robust regulation. Ensuring accessibility and equity is also essential to ensure that the benefits of these advances are shared equitably. The development of neuroprostheses and BCIs has had a positive impact.
Cognitive Enhancement: Unanswered Questions About Human Psychology and Social Behavior

Eric Racine,Sebastian Sattler,Wren Boehlen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00294-w

IF: 3.777

2021-03-23

Science and Engineering Ethics

Abstract:Abstract Stimulant drugs, transcranial magnetic stimulation, brain-computer interfaces, and even genetic modifications are all discussed as forms of potential cognitive enhancement. Cognitive enhancement can be conceived as a benefit-seeking strategy used by healthy individuals to enhance cognitive abilities such as learning, memory, attention, or vigilance. This phenomenon is hotly debated in the public, professional, and scientific literature. Many of the statements favoring cognitive enhancement (e.g., related to greater productivity and autonomy) or opposing it (e.g., related to health-risks and social expectations) rely on claims about human welfare and human flourishing. But with real-world evidence from the social and psychological sciences often missing to support (or invalidate) these claims, the debate about cognitive enhancement is stalled. In this paper, we describe a set of crucial debated questions about psychological and social aspects of cognitive enhancement (e.g., intrinsic motivation, well-being) and explain why they are of fundamental importance to address in the cognitive enhancement debate and in future research. We propose studies targeting social and psychological outcomes associated with cognitive enhancers (e.g., stigmatization, burnout, mental well-being, work motivation). We also voice a call for scientific evidence, inclusive of but not limited to biological health outcomes, to thoroughly assess the impact of enhancement. This evidence is needed to engage in empirically informed policymaking, as well as to promote the mental and physical health of users and non-users of enhancement.

ethics,history & philosophy of science,multidisciplinary sciences,engineering, multidisciplinary
Enhanced Cognition, Enhanced Self? On Neuroenhancement and Subjectivity

Agata Ferretti,Marcello Ienca

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-018-0109-9

2018-11-12

Journal of Cognitive Enhancement

Abstract:This paper investigates the implications of neuroenhancement from a first-person and phenomenological perspective that focuses on the role of the human brain and body as mediators of subjective experience. This analysis is conducted both on historical-philosophical and empirical grounds. At the historical-philosophical level, this article examines the frameworks of phenomenology and embodied cognition to explore how these theoretical approaches link the materiality of the body (including that of exogenous integrations such as implants) to the way in which subjects perceive themselves and experience reality. At the empirical level, the article attempts to corroborate this philosophical stance by critically assessing the emerging body of scientific evidence on the phenomenological effects of neuroenhancement technologies. Based on a narrative mini-review, this paper will argue that the quantitative enhancement of a cognitive or other physical function of the human body does not necessarily result in an equal qualitative improvement of a subject’s phenomenological experience. Indeed, a physical alteration designed to quantitatively augment a specific human capability may have ambivalent effects on how the subject experientially perceives that modification. This indeterminacy between the quantitative and qualitative dimension of neuroenhancement seems to challenge the thesis that any objectively measured improvement of a cognitive or other physical function of the human body directly corresponds to better personal and psychological well-being.
The Ethical Considerations of Human Medicinal Enhancement

FENG Ye,WANG Guo-yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19484/j.cnki.1000-8934.2011.03.023

2011-01-01

Abstract:We research three obvious features of human enhancement under the new science and technology.Based on them,we also review the possibly ethical and social implications for health & safety,autonomy & dignity,social system of fair competition,and social stability.Furthermore,we analyse the technological,ethical and legal feasibility of human medicinal enhancement.
The Social and Economic Impacts of Cognitive Enhancement

Anders Sandberg,Julian Savulescu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444393552.ch6

2014-03-28

Abstract:The possibility of enhancing human abilities often raises public concern about equality and social impact. This chapter aims at one particular group of technologies, cognitive enhancement, and one particular fear, that enhancement will create social divisions and possibly expanding inequalities. The chapter argues that cognitive enhancements could offer significant social and economic benefits. The basic forms of internal cognitive enhancement technologies foreseen today are pharmacological modifications, genetic interventions, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and neural implants. Cognitive enhancements can influence the economy through reduction of losses, individual economic benefits, and society‐wide benefits. The strongest objection to the introduction of any enhancement technology is that it will create inequality, injustice, and unfairness. While there are clear economic and social benefits to cognitive enhancement, there exist anumber of obstacles to its development and use. One obstacle is the present system for licensing drugs and medical treatments.
Genetic enhancement from the perspective of transhumanism: exploring a new paradigm of transhuman evolution

Yawen Zou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-024-10224-9

2024-08-28

Abstract:Transhumanism is a movement that advocates for the enhancement of human capabilities through the use of advanced technologies such as genetic enhancement. This article explores the definition, history, and development of transhumanism. Then, it compares the stance on genetic enhancement from the perspectives of bio-conservatism, bio-liberalism, and transhumanism. This article posits that transhuman evolution has twofold implications, allowing for the integration of transhumanist research and evolutionary biology. First, it offers a compelling scientific framework for understanding genetic enhancement, avoiding technological progressivism, and incorporating concepts of evolutionary biology. Second, it represents a new evolutionary paradigm distinct from traditional Lamarckism and Darwinism. It marks the third synthesis of evolutionary biology, offering fresh perspectives on established concepts such as artificial selection and gene-culture co-evolution. In recent decades, human enhancement has captivated not only evolutionary biologists, neurobiologists, psychologists, and philosophers, but also those in fields such as cybernetics and artificial intelligence. In addition to genetic enhancement, other human enhancement technologies, including brain-computer interfaces and brain uploading, are currently under development, which the paradigm of transhuman evolution can better integrate into its framework.
Beyond Accessibility: Lifting Perceptual Limitations for Everyone

Michael Mauderer,Garreth W. Tigwell,Benjamin M. Gorman,David R. Flatla

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1709.08957

IF: 6.4588

2017-09-26

Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract:We propose that accessibility research can lay the foundation for technology that can be used to augment the perception of everyone. To show how this can be achieved, we present three case studies of our research in which we demonstrate our approaches for impaired colour vision, situational visual impairments and situational hearing impairment.
The unknowns of cognitive enhancement

Martha J Farah,Martha J. Farah

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5893

IF: 56.9

2015-10-23

Science

Abstract:Can science and policy catch up with practice?

multidisciplinary sciences
Unfreedom or Mere Inability? The Case of Biomedical Enhancement

Ji Young Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhae007

2024-02-28

Abstract:Abstract Mere inability, which refers to what persons are naturally unable to do, is traditionally thought to be distinct from unfreedom, which is a social type of constraint. The advent of biomedical enhancement, however, challenges the idea that there is a clear division between mere inability and unfreedom. This is because bioenhancement makes it possible for some people’s mere inabilities to become matters of unfreedom. In this paper, I discuss several ways that this might occur: first, bioenhancement can exacerbate social pressures to enhance one’s abilities; second, people may face discrimination for not enhancing; third, the new abilities made possible due to bioenhancement may be accompanied by new inabilities for the enhanced and unenhanced; and finally, shifting values around abilities and inabilities due to bioenhancement may reinforce a pre-existing ableism about human abilities. As such, we must give careful consideration to these potential unfreedom-generating outcomes when it comes to our moral evaluations of bioenhancement.

social sciences, biomedical,ethics
An Integrative Introduction to Human Augmentation Science

Bradly Alicea

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.10521

2018-04-26

Abstract:Human Augmentation (HA) spans several technical fields and methodological approaches, including Experimental Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, Psychophysiology, and Artificial Intelligence. Augmentation involves various strategies for optimizing and controlling cognitive states, which requires an understanding of biological plasticity, dynamic cognitive processes, and models of adaptive systems. As an instructive lesson, we will explore a few HA-related concepts and outstanding issues. Next, we focus on inducing and controlling HA using experimental methods by introducing three techniques for HA implementation: learning augmentation, augmentation using physical media, and extended phenotype modeling. To conclude, we will review integrative approaches to augmentation, which transcend specific functions.

Neurons and Cognition,Human-Computer Interaction
Prosthetic dreams: “Wow Effect”, mechanical paradigm and modular body – prospects on prosthetics

Jérôme Goffette

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2016.1273635

2017-01-04

Sport in Society

Abstract:Over the last few decades a number of improvements in prostheses have transformed disability sport. A philosophical, prospective approach reveals three phenomena. Firstly, the public reception of the Paralympic Games has generated what one can call a ‘Wow Effect’, combining amazement, technological interest and thoughtful states of mind, with both positive and negative effects for the representation of disabled persons. Secondly, the role of prosthetics impels us to perceive many disabled sports as mechanical sports, with different possible patterns of regulation, from prohibition to laissez-faire. Thirdly, the present paper pleads for a sports model that is different from that of able-bodied sports, insisting less on rivalry/hierarchy and more on enjoying new ways of being, new ways of experiencing our relationship with abilities, disabilities, super-abilities and alter-abilities. In fact, disability sport can be viewed as a laboratory for the modular body, which is a topic that concerns all of us.

sociology,hospitality, leisure, sport & tourism
The Perils of Cognitive Enhancement and the Urgent Imperative to Enhance the Moral Character of Humanity

INGMAR PERSSON,JULIAN SAVULESCU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2008.00410.x

2008-08-01

Journal of Applied Philosophy

Abstract:abstract As history shows, some human beings are capable of acting very immorally. 1 Technological advance and consequent exponential growth in cognitive power means that even rare evil individuals can act with catastrophic effect. The advance of science makes biological, nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction easier and easier to fabricate and, thus, increases the probability that they will come into the hands of small terrorist groups and deranged individuals. Cognitive enhancement by means of drugs, implants and biological (including genetic) interventions could thus accelerate the advance of science, or its application, and so increase the risk of the development or misuse of weapons of mass destruction. We argue that this is a reason which speaks against the desirability of cognitive enhancement, and the consequent speedier growth of knowledge, if it is not accompanied by an extensive moral enhancement of humankind. We review the possibilities for moral enhancement by biomedical and genetic means and conclude that, though it should be possible in principle, it is in practice probably distant. There is thus a reason not to support cognitive enhancement in the foreseeable future. However, we grant that there are also reasons in its favour, but we do not attempt to settle the balance between these reasons for and against. Rather, we conclude that if research into cognitive enhancement continues, as it is likely to, it must be accompanied by research into moral enhancement.

ethics
Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: a human enhancement story

Niklas Alexander Döbler,Claus-Christian Carbon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41231-021-00104-2

Abstract:Background: Vaccination is an essential strategy for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic. Besides its significance as a public health measure, vaccination is a sophisticated example of modern biotechnology. Since vaccination gives the human body an ability that it does not naturally possess, the question arises as to its classification as Human Enhancement. Main body: Exemplified on a selection of different definitions, we conclude that vaccinations may indeed be classified and treated as a form of Human Enhancement. This raises some ethical issues that are notorious in the broad field of Human Enhancement. A study with N = 67 participants revealed that vaccinations are perceived neither as a clear nor poor example of Human Enhancement. Conclusion: We argue that qualifying vaccination technology as Human Enhancement does not provide convincing arguments to reject vaccination. By examining the Human Enhancement debate and the similarities to the issue of vaccination shown here, policymakers can learn valuable lessons regarding mass vaccination programs' current and future handling.
From Therapy to Technological Enhancement: A Socio-Ethical Perspective

Jana Tomašovičová

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sc-2022-0009

2022-01-01

Social Communication

Abstract:Abstract The classical distinction between the natural and the artificial is gradually losing its original sharpness. Biotechnology can be used not only for therapeutic purposes but also to enhance human cognitive, emotional, moral, or physical abilities. This article discusses three of the most important socio-ethical issues related to the impact of neuroenhancement on individuals and on society. It closely examines threats to the principle of autonomy in the case of two selected technologies for neuroenhancement: the Brain – Computer Interface and gene technologies applied to the enhancement of other beings. The article also discusses the influence of social pressure on autonomous decision-making by individuals and whether social pressure is a sufficient reason for not accepting neuroenhancement. Finally, within the context of many concerns about the widening of social inequality as the result of the spread of enhancement practices, this article examines whether such disparities can be avoided and whether the principle of equal opportunities can be regarded as a sufficient criterion of equality.
Pharmacological Human Enhancement: An Overview of the Looming Bioethical and Regulatory Challenges

Giovanna Ricci

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00053

2020-02-17

Abstract:Cognitive enhancement, a rather broad-ranging principle, can be achieved in various ways: healthy eating and consistent physical exercise can lead to long-term improvements in many cognitive domains; commonplace stimulants such as caffeine, on the other hand, temporarily raise levels of alertness, attentiveness, and concentration; sedative substances are also used as an indirect form of enhancement to relax before an exam or an important meeting. Such approaches raise no ethical issue. Nonetheless, clinical research has led to the off-label use of drugs called nootropics or "smart drugs", which can, under certain conditions, elicit some degree of cognition-improving effects: methylphenidate and modafinil can enhance working memory and concentration in healthy individuals, although the significance and effectiveness of such applications are dubious. Such "cognitive enhancement" methods, however, do raise multiple ethical issues, and their contentious nature has caused bioethical authorities to lay out opinions and recommendations meant to regulate their use. Most notably, the Italian Committee on Bioethics has extensively dealt with the spread of nootropics, which resulted in the Italian Code of Medical Ethics including "cognitive enhancement" drugs and their prescription by doctors as critical points, along with cosmetic surgery (the latest version of the Code, updated in December 2017, deals with the two separately, in Article 76 and 76 BIS). The United States Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues broadened the scope of cognitive enhancement techniques so as to include neural modifiers, i.e. mechanisms of brain and nervous system change: a much wider array of interventions, technologies, behaviors, and environmental conditions that may potentially affect several aspects of the human brain and nervous system. The potential of neuroscience to profoundly reshape society is nothing short of mind-blowing.
Hacking the Brain: Dimensions of Cognitive Enhancement

Martin Dresler,Anders Sandberg,Christoph Bublitz,Kathrin Ohla,Carlos Trenado,Aleksandra Mroczko-Wąsowicz,Simone Kühn,Dimitris Repantis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00571

2018-12-14

ACS Chemical Neuroscience

Abstract:In an increasingly complex information society, demands for cognitive functioning are growing steadily. In recent years, numerous strategies to augment brain function have been proposed. Evidence for their efficacy (or lack thereof) and side effects has prompted discussions about ethical, societal, and medical implications. In the public debate, cognitive enhancement is often seen as a monolithic phenomenon. On a closer look, however, cognitive enhancement turns out to be a multifaceted concept: There is not one cognitive enhancer that augments brain function per se, but a great variety of interventions that can be clustered into biochemical, physical, and behavioral enhancement strategies. These cognitive enhancers differ in their mode of action, the cognitive domain they target, the time scale they work on, their availability and side effects, and how they differentially affect different groups of subjects. Here we disentangle the dimensions of cognitive enhancement, review prominent examples of cognitive enhancers that differ across these dimensions, and thereby provide a framework for both theoretical discussions and empirical research.

biochemistry & molecular biology,chemistry, medicinal,neurosciences

Human enhancement: from disability to superability

The end of spasticity?

Second Thoughts on Enhancement and Disability

Emerging Medical Technologies and Their Use in Bionic Repair and Human Augmentation

Revolutionizing Human Augmentation: The Future of Neuroprosthetics and Brain-Computer Interface Technologies

Cognitive Enhancement: Unanswered Questions About Human Psychology and Social Behavior

Enhanced Cognition, Enhanced Self? On Neuroenhancement and Subjectivity

The Ethical Considerations of Human Medicinal Enhancement

The Social and Economic Impacts of Cognitive Enhancement

Genetic enhancement from the perspective of transhumanism: exploring a new paradigm of transhuman evolution

Beyond Accessibility: Lifting Perceptual Limitations for Everyone

The unknowns of cognitive enhancement

Unfreedom or Mere Inability? The Case of Biomedical Enhancement

An Integrative Introduction to Human Augmentation Science

Prosthetic dreams: “Wow Effect”, mechanical paradigm and modular body – prospects on prosthetics

The Perils of Cognitive Enhancement and the Urgent Imperative to Enhance the Moral Character of Humanity

Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: a human enhancement story

From Therapy to Technological Enhancement: A Socio-Ethical Perspective

Pharmacological Human Enhancement: An Overview of the Looming Bioethical and Regulatory Challenges

Hacking the Brain: Dimensions of Cognitive Enhancement