Abstract:BackgroundIn modern biomedical research of complex diseases, a large number of demographic and clinical variables, herein called phenomic data, are often collected and missing values (MVs) are inevitable in the data collection process. Since many downstream statistical and bioinformatics methods require complete data matrix, imputation is a common and practical solution. In high-throughput experiments such as microarray experiments, continuous intensities are measured and many mature missing value imputation methods have been developed and widely applied. Numerous methods for missing data imputation of microarray data have been developed. Large phenomic data, however, contain continuous, nominal, binary and ordinal data types, which void application of most methods. Though several methods have been developed in the past few years, not a single complete guideline is proposed with respect to phenomic missing data imputation.ResultsIn this paper, we investigated existing imputation methods for phenomic data, proposed a self-training selection (STS) scheme to select the best imputation method and provide a practical guideline for general applications. We introduced a novel concept of "imputability measure" (IM) to identify missing values that are fundamentally inadequate to impute. In addition, we also developed four variations of K-nearest-neighbor (KNN) methods and compared with two existing methods, multivariate imputation by chained equations (MICE) and missForest. The four variations are imputation by variables (KNN-V), by subjects (KNN-S), their weighted hybrid (KNN-H) and an adaptively weighted hybrid (KNN-A). We performed simulations and applied different imputation methods and the STS scheme to three lung disease phenomic datasets to evaluate the methods. An R package "phenomeImpute" is made publicly available.ConclusionsSimulations and applications to real datasets showed that MICE often did not perform well; KNN-A, KNN-H and random forest were among the top performers although no method universally performed the best. Imputation of missing values with low imputability measures increased imputation errors greatly and could potentially deteriorate downstream analyses. The STS scheme was accurate in selecting the optimal method by evaluating methods in a second layer of missingness simulation. All source files for the simulation and the real data analyses are available on the author's publication website.

Missing value imputation: a review and analysis of the literature (2006–2017)

Machine Learning for Missing Value Imputation

An Experimental Survey of Missing Data Imputation Algorithms

A novel and efficient risk minimization-based missing value imputation algorithm

A Systematic Literature Review On Missing Values: Research Trends, Datasets, Methods and Frameworks

Missing Data Imputation: Focusing on Single Imputation.

MVIAeval: a web tool for comprehensively evaluating the performance of a new missing value imputation algorithm

Missing Values Imputation Based on Iterative Learning

Missing value imputation in high-dimensional phenomic data: imputable or not, and how?

Missing values imputation hypothesis: An experimental evaluation

An Intelligent Missing Data Imputation Techniques: A Review

A Robust Missing Value Imputation Method MifImpute For Incomplete Molecular Descriptor Data And Comparative Analysis With Other Missing Value Imputation Methods

Evaluation of imputation techniques with varying percentage of missing data

A review on missing values for main challenges and methods

A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Missing Value Imputation

Performance comparison of State-of-the-art Missing Value Imputation Algorithms on Some Bench mark Datasets

Missing Value Imputation on Multidimensional Time Series

Handling missing values in healthcare data: A systematic review of deep learning-based imputation techniques

Missing Data Exploration: Highlighting Graphical Presentation of Missing Pattern.

Imputation methods for mixed datasets in bioarchaeology

A Benchmark for Data Imputation Methods