Monitoring of surface cleaning and disinfection in a Brazilian pediatric unit
Lucas de Oliveira Bernardes,Fernando Ribeiro dos Santos,Natália Liberato Norberto Angeloni,Mara Cristina Ribeiro Furlan,Larissa da Silva Barcelos,Adriano Menis Ferreira,Alvaro Francisco Lopes de Sousa,Denise de Andrade,Marília Duarte Valim,Odinea Maria Amorim Batista,Luís Velez Lapão,Helder de Pádua Lima,Aires Garcia dos Santos Junior
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361221148007
2023-01-01
Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease
Abstract:Background: Understanding the correlation between the methods of monitoring surface cleaning and disinfection (SCD) is fundamental for better infection control. Purpose: This study aims to correlate the SCD monitoring methods in a Brazilian pediatric unit. This is an exploratory, longitudinal, and correlational study. Methods: The study was conducted in a pediatric hospitalization unit of a medium-sized hospital from December 2020 to March 2021. Four high-contact surfaces were analyzed before and after the cleaning and disinfection process by means of visual inspection, quantification of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and colony-forming unit (CFU) count. The study consisted of three stages: stage I involving situational diagnosis of the SCD process; stage II referring to the implementation of the Surface Cleaning and Disinfection Standardization Program (SCDSP); and stage III involving long-term assessment after implementing the program. A total of 192 assessments were performed in each stage, totaling 576 in the three study stages. Conclusions: A significant correlation was found between the ATP quantification methods and microbial count in the bed railing ( p = 0.009) and companion’s armchair ( p = 0.018) surfaces. In both cases, Spearman’s correlation coefficients were positive, indicating a positive correlation between ATP and microbial count scores, that is, the higher the ATP values (in RLUs), the greater the microbial counts (in CFUs/cm 2 ). The analysis of the ROC curves suggests that the surfaces presenting ATP below 108 RLUs can be considered approved. The ATP method yielded 78.6% sensitivity; in turn, microbial count presented a sensitivity of 85.7%. It is important to use different methods to monitor the cleaning and disinfection of surfaces, as each one has different sensitivity and specificity.