Comparing the curative effects of different external fixators in the tibia lengthening for inequality of lower limb or short statures
Hua-qing Yang,He-tao Xia,Ai-min Peng,Kun-zheng Wang,Xiao-qian Dang,Wen-yuan Shi,Yi-lian Han
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2006.32.014
2006-01-01
Abstract:AIM: To observe the therapy effect of different external fixators in the tibia lengthening to treat inequality of lower limb or short statures, analyze advantage and disadvantage of different external fixators. METHODS:From February 1998 to June 2003 4 patients with inequality of lower limb and 27 patients with short statures who were treated at the Department of Orthopaedics, Yuquan Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing Institute of External Skeletal Fixation Technology, Department of Orthopaedics, Second Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University were enrolled as observational objects. Patients with inequality of lower limb were subjected to Hoffman one-arm external fixators. Among the 27 patients with short statures, 3 patients received semi-ring fixators; 5 patients received full-ring fixators; 19 patients received Xiahetao external and intramedullary lengthening fixators. ①Hoffman one-arm fixators: Threading two group 5 mm round osseous pin crossing in the amphi broken-end osteotomy, and one-arm fixators were installed in leg anteriomedialis.②Ilizarov full-ring fixators and semi-ring fixators:Threading two group 2 mm Kirschner wire in the proximate osteotomy, and 2 group needle in the distal end. One was in the 10 cm upper to ankle joint, and another was in the distal end of 10 cm proximal ankle-joint. Of them, one needle crossed fibular bone. ③Xiahetao external and intramedullary lengthening fixators: operative approach of intramedullary locking nail-microwound osteotomy-implanting bone nail-installing dynamic state synchronous lengthening device. The limbs were lengthened at a speed of 0.5-1.0 mm per day starting from the 8th day after the operation, averagely 0.65 mm per day, 4-6 times a day. Proper weight-loading exercise with walker and functional movement on instrument were done during the process of limb lengthening to stimulate the newly formed bone two weeks after operation. X-ray actinogram was gained once every 16 day, and X-ray actinogram was taken once every 2 month after 3 times to survey limb lengthening problem and complication. Time of therapy was 8-15 months. Clinical and X-ray standards were mature bony callus formation, complete bony callus plugging, no defective calcification, feedthrough marrow cavity, and the new formed bone strength could support walking and no fracture. RESULTS: Followed up from 3 to 8 years, all the 31 patients were followed up, and the follow-up rate was 100%. ①The complications of one-arm fixators was serious and large scar could be seen in lengthened areas, the maximum lengthened amplitude was no more than 4 cm. ②The serious footdrop would occur if the lengthened amplitude exceeded 4 cm with semi-ring fixator. ③The lengthened amplitude of Ilizarov full-ring fixators could achieve l0 cm and had footdrop complications. ④Xiahetao external and intramedullary lengthening fixators could achieve l0 cm and had mild complications. CONCLUSION: As the lengthening effect is poor, the one-arm fixators is unsuitable in the lengthening of lower limb. In the usage of semi-ring fixators and Ilizarov full-ring fixators, the high-rate of footdrop results in unfitness to do more amplitude lengthening. Xiahetao external and intramedullary lengthening fixators with tendon synchronous lengthening device has good stability and the operation of lengthening is simple, so it will be suitable for a large amplitude lengthening.